Compare
Dyers Crossing vs Nabiac
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.2 km apart · Dyers Crossing profile · Nabiac profile
Dyers Crossing Nabiac
Nabiac and Dyers Crossing are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with very different levels of local access. Nabiac is more walkable and has more facilities nearby; for example, 39.1% of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while Dyers Crossing has 0.0%. Nabiac also has larger schools, with an average size of 337 compared to 40 in Dyers Crossing, and a larger First Nations population, which is well higher at 7.8% compared to 3.8% in Dyers Crossing.
Both areas are similar in their typical weekly family income, which sits around $1,380. They also share similar proportions of residents who completed Year 12 and those living with long-term health conditions. While Nabiac remains mostly car-dependent, its walkability score is far higher than the car-dependent Dyers Crossing. Other differences remain marked, such as the typical age, which is noticeably older in Dyers Crossing at 53 compared to 48 in Nabiac.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 340
- First area, 2016: 337
- First area, 2021: 346
- Second area, 2011: 1,508
- Second area, 2016: 1,252
- Second area, 2021: 1,294
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dyers Crossing: 0.9% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Nabiac: 0.6% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Dyers Crossing: 0.0% males, 2.8% females; 80–84 in Nabiac: 1.3% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Dyers Crossing: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Nabiac: 3.0% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Dyers Crossing: 1.6% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Nabiac: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 65–69 in Dyers Crossing: 7.5% males, 6.3% females; 65–69 in Nabiac: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Dyers Crossing: 6.0% males, 6.6% females; 60–64 in Nabiac: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 55–59 in Dyers Crossing: 2.8% males, 5.7% females; 55–59 in Nabiac: 4.3% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Dyers Crossing: 3.5% males, 5.3% females; 50–54 in Nabiac: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Dyers Crossing: 1.9% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Nabiac: 2.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Dyers Crossing: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 40–44 in Nabiac: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Dyers Crossing: 2.2% males, 1.6% females; 35–39 in Nabiac: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Dyers Crossing: 1.6% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Nabiac: 1.5% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Dyers Crossing: 0.9% males, 0.9% females; 25–29 in Nabiac: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Dyers Crossing: 0.9% males, 0.9% females; 20–24 in Nabiac: 2.5% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Dyers Crossing: 1.3% males, 5.0% females; 15–19 in Nabiac: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Dyers Crossing: 5.3% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Nabiac: 3.5% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Dyers Crossing: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Nabiac: 2.5% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Dyers Crossing: 2.8% males, 1.3% females; 0–4 in Nabiac: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $412
- First area, 2016: $503
- First area, 2021: $503
- Second area, 2011: $391
- Second area, 2016: $470
- Second area, 2021: $562
- First area, 2011: $1,042
- First area, 2016: $1,042
- First area, 2021: $1,149
- Second area, 2011: $820
- Second area, 2016: $972
- Second area, 2021: $1,253
- First area, 2011: $1,272
- First area, 2016: $1,303
- First area, 2021: $1,392
- Second area, 2011: $888
- Second area, 2016: $1,081
- Second area, 2021: $1,377
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $138
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $288
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,430
- First area, 2016: $1,560
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dyers Crossing with nearby areas
Compare Nabiac with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dyers Crossing vs Nabiac [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11341/dyers-crossing/vs/SAL12896/nabiac