Compare
Charles Sturt University vs Downside
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.3 km apart · Charles Sturt University profile · Downside profile
Charles Sturt University Downside
Charles Sturt University and Downside are neighbouring areas with very different populations. Charles Sturt University is a young hub where the typical resident is just 20, 97% of people moved there in the last five years, and typical weekly incomes are low at $317. In contrast, Downside is much older with a typical age of 46 and a more established population; typical weekly incomes are far higher at $969, and 19.4% of residents are children under 15.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people with long-term health conditions, at around 23%. While they share similar typical household incomes, they differ in almost every other way. Downside has a much higher share of adults working or looking for work (80.8% compared to 56.4%), while Charles Sturt University has far more people using another language at home and a much higher rate of people who have finished Year 12.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 563
- First area, 2016: 340
- First area, 2021: 433
- Second area, 2011: 419
- Second area, 2016: 124
- Second area, 2021: 124
- First area, 2011: 20 yrs
- First area, 2016: 20 yrs
- First area, 2021: 20 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Downside: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Downside: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Downside: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Downside: 6.7% males, 5.0% females
- 65–69 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Downside: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Downside: 3.4% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Downside: 2.5% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Downside: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Downside: 7.6% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Downside: 4.2% males, 4.2% females
- 35–39 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Downside: 5.0% males, 5.0% females
- 30–34 in Charles Sturt University: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Downside: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Charles Sturt University: 1.6% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Downside: 4.2% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Charles Sturt University: 19.6% males, 38.8% females; 20–24 in Downside: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Charles Sturt University: 9.2% males, 25.4% females; 15–19 in Downside: 2.5% males, 5.9% females
- 10–14 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Downside: 2.5% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Downside: 3.4% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Charles Sturt University: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Downside: 3.4% males, 5.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $208
- First area, 2016: $198
- First area, 2021: $317
- Second area, 2011: $685
- Second area, 2016: $941
- Second area, 2021: $969
- First area, 2021: $2,750
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,875
- Second area, 2021: $2,583
- First area, 2021: $2,750
- Second area, 2011: $1,886
- Second area, 2016: $2,625
- Second area, 2021: $2,833
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $315
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $185
- Second area, 2011: $1,700
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2021: 0.60
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Charles Sturt University with nearby areas
Compare Downside with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Charles Sturt University vs Downside [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10883/charles-sturt-university/vs/SAL11287/downside