Compare
Cessnock vs Kitchener
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.9 km apart · Cessnock profile · Kitchener profile
Cessnock Kitchener
Cessnock and Kitchener are neighbouring areas with very different lifestyles. Kitchener is more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $1,962 compared to $1,192 in Cessnock. It is also more residential and family-oriented, with 89.7% of homes having three or more bedrooms and a much higher share of children under 15 (23.3% versus 17.1%). In contrast, Cessnock is more urban and transient, with a far higher rate of renters (37.7% versus 5.6%) and a larger number of one-parent families (28.0% versus 14.4%).
Both areas share a similar typical personal income of around $600 a week and a drive time to the city of about 100 minutes. While they are alike in these ways, their accessibility differs greatly; Cessnock is somewhat walkable with many homes near public transport, whereas Kitchener is mostly car-dependent. These gaps in transport and walkability have remained stark, while the typical age of residents in both places has stayed relatively close, with those in Cessnock being just three years older on average.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,673
- First area, 2016: 15,177
- First area, 2021: 16,300
- Second area, 2011: 530
- Second area, 2016: 479
- Second area, 2021: 679
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cessnock: 1.2% males, 2.3% females; 85+ in Kitchener: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Cessnock: 1.1% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Kitchener: 1.3% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Cessnock: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Kitchener: 1.5% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Cessnock: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Kitchener: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Cessnock: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Kitchener: 3.0% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Cessnock: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Kitchener: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Cessnock: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Kitchener: 2.5% males, 1.8% females
- 50–54 in Cessnock: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Kitchener: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Cessnock: 3.3% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Kitchener: 3.1% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Cessnock: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Kitchener: 4.0% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Cessnock: 3.9% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Kitchener: 4.1% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Cessnock: 4.2% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Kitchener: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Cessnock: 4.1% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Kitchener: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Cessnock: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Kitchener: 3.0% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Cessnock: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Kitchener: 4.7% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Cessnock: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Kitchener: 4.4% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Cessnock: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Kitchener: 4.6% males, 4.9% females
- 0–4 in Cessnock: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Kitchener: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $426
- First area, 2016: $488
- First area, 2021: $588
- Second area, 2011: $415
- Second area, 2016: $462
- Second area, 2021: $600
- First area, 2011: $870
- First area, 2016: $990
- First area, 2021: $1,192
- Second area, 2011: $1,178
- Second area, 2016: $1,156
- Second area, 2021: $1,962
- First area, 2011: $1,112
- First area, 2016: $1,227
- First area, 2021: $1,471
- Second area, 2011: $1,295
- Second area, 2016: $1,375
- Second area, 2021: $2,048
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $210
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $250
- Second area, 2016: $290
- Second area, 2021: $325
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,473
- First area, 2021: $1,499
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cessnock with nearby areas
Compare Kitchener with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cessnock vs Kitchener [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10877/cessnock/vs/SAL12183/kitchener