Compare
Casula vs Glenfield
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Casula profile · Glenfield profile
Casula Glenfield
Casula and Glenfield (NSW) are neighbouring areas with different layouts and levels of amenity. Casula is far more walkable, with 78.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to just 16.8% in Glenfield (NSW). It also has much better access to health services and more street intersections. In contrast, Glenfield (NSW) is more highly qualified, with 33.0% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 21.1% in Casula. This higher level of education is consistent with a typical weekly income that is well higher in Glenfield (NSW) at $844, while Casula's is $645.
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining closely matched in several ways. Both have the same typical resident age of 36 and an almost identical share of children under 15. They are also both very diverse places; for example, between 44.6% and 49.4% of residents were born overseas, which is far above the national figure. While Glenfield (NSW) has much better transit links to other people, both areas have a high share of people working from home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,696
- First area, 2016: 15,662
- First area, 2021: 16,584
- Second area, 2011: 7,558
- Second area, 2016: 9,633
- Second area, 2021: 10,536
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Casula: 0.7% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Glenfield: 0.9% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Casula: 0.7% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Glenfield: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Casula: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Glenfield: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Casula: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Glenfield: 1.5% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Casula: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Glenfield: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Casula: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Glenfield: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Casula: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Glenfield: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Casula: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Glenfield: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Casula: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Glenfield: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Casula: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Glenfield: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Casula: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Glenfield: 4.4% males, 4.8% females
- 30–34 in Casula: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Glenfield: 3.6% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Casula: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Glenfield: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 20–24 in Casula: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Glenfield: 3.3% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Casula: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Glenfield: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Casula: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Glenfield: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Casula: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Glenfield: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Casula: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Glenfield: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $527
- First area, 2016: $584
- First area, 2021: $645
- Second area, 2011: $611
- Second area, 2016: $712
- Second area, 2021: $844
- First area, 2011: $1,366
- First area, 2016: $1,584
- First area, 2021: $1,730
- Second area, 2011: $1,394
- Second area, 2016: $1,757
- Second area, 2021: $2,070
- First area, 2011: $1,459
- First area, 2016: $1,714
- First area, 2021: $1,917
- Second area, 2011: $1,563
- Second area, 2016: $1,861
- Second area, 2021: $2,203
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $340
- First area, 2016: $420
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $290
- Second area, 2016: $390
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,965
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Casula with nearby areas
Compare Glenfield with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Casula vs Glenfield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10851/casula/vs/SAL11668/glenfield