Compare
Bossley Park vs Edensor Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Bossley Park profile · Edensor Park profile
Bossley Park Edensor Park
Bossley Park and Edensor Park are neighbouring suburbs with large populations and similar profiles. The biggest differences involve local access and income; Bossley Park is far better for reaching health services on foot (72.4% versus 49.0%), while Edensor Park has far more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (61.4% versus 50.8%). Edensor Park also has a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (23.0% compared to 18.9%).
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked closely, maintaining similar shares of children under 15 and people who speak little or no English. Both suburbs are far above the national figure for homes with three or more bedrooms, and they share a high proportion of residents born overseas. They also both have a much lower share of adults working or looking for work than the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,028
- First area, 2016: 14,585
- First area, 2021: 15,492
- Second area, 2011: 9,440
- Second area, 2016: 9,772
- Second area, 2021: 10,279
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bossley Park: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Edensor Park: 0.6% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Bossley Park: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Edensor Park: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Bossley Park: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Edensor Park: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Bossley Park: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Edensor Park: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Bossley Park: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Edensor Park: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Bossley Park: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Edensor Park: 3.3% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Bossley Park: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Edensor Park: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Bossley Park: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Edensor Park: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Bossley Park: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Edensor Park: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Bossley Park: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Edensor Park: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Bossley Park: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Edensor Park: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Bossley Park: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Edensor Park: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Bossley Park: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Edensor Park: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Bossley Park: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Edensor Park: 3.2% males, 4.1% females
- 15–19 in Bossley Park: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Edensor Park: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 10–14 in Bossley Park: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Edensor Park: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Bossley Park: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Edensor Park: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Bossley Park: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Edensor Park: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $438
- First area, 2016: $481
- First area, 2021: $497
- Second area, 2011: $460
- Second area, 2016: $488
- Second area, 2021: $538
- First area, 2011: $1,381
- First area, 2016: $1,511
- First area, 2021: $1,542
- Second area, 2011: $1,458
- Second area, 2016: $1,637
- Second area, 2021: $1,817
- First area, 2011: $1,369
- First area, 2016: $1,513
- First area, 2021: $1,639
- Second area, 2011: $1,411
- Second area, 2016: $1,565
- Second area, 2021: $1,805
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.4
- First area, 2016: 3.4
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.5
- Second area, 2016: 3.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $440
- First area, 2021: $465
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $425
- Second area, 2021: $450
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,026
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bossley Park with nearby areas
Compare Edensor Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bossley Park vs Edensor Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10513/bossley-park/vs/SAL11380/edensor-park