Compare
Beechwood vs Rosewood
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.5 km apart · Beechwood profile · Rosewood profile
Beechwood Rosewood
Beechwood and Rosewood (Port Macquarie-Hastings - NSW) are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Residents are far older in Rosewood (Port Macquarie-Hastings - NSW), where the typical age is 52 compared to 37 in Beechwood. Home ownership also differs sharply; 63.3% of homes in Rosewood (Port Macquarie-Hastings - NSW) are owned outright, while that figure is much lower in Beechwood at 36.8%. Beechwood is more accessible, with a walkability score of 2.5 (mostly car-dependent) and more public transport options, whereas Rosewood (Port Macquarie-Hastings - NSW) is car-dependent and has no public transport stops.
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011 in terms of their core economics. They share a typical weekly personal income of around $720 and have nearly identical rates of adults working or looking for work. They are also almost exactly alike in their housing styles, with almost every home being a separate detached house. Both areas sit well below the national figure for the share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 571
- First area, 2016: 615
- First area, 2021: 914
- Second area, 2011: 345
- Second area, 2016: 224
- Second area, 2021: 221
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beechwood: 0.0% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Rosewood: 1.4% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Beechwood: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Rosewood: 1.4% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Beechwood: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Rosewood: 2.4% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Beechwood: 2.5% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Rosewood: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
- 65–69 in Beechwood: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Rosewood: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Beechwood: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Rosewood: 5.2% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Beechwood: 3.0% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Rosewood: 2.4% males, 7.1% females
- 50–54 in Beechwood: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Rosewood: 2.8% males, 5.2% females
- 45–49 in Beechwood: 2.4% males, 1.9% females; 45–49 in Rosewood: 1.9% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Beechwood: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Rosewood: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 35–39 in Beechwood: 3.5% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Rosewood: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Beechwood: 3.1% males, 5.2% females; 30–34 in Rosewood: 1.4% males, 3.8% females
- 25–29 in Beechwood: 3.3% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Rosewood: 1.9% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Beechwood: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Rosewood: 0.0% males, 1.4% females
- 15–19 in Beechwood: 3.4% males, 4.1% females; 15–19 in Rosewood: 2.8% males, 4.2% females
- 10–14 in Beechwood: 3.9% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Rosewood: 0.0% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Beechwood: 4.6% males, 3.8% females; 5–9 in Rosewood: 4.7% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Beechwood: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Rosewood: 3.3% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $428
- First area, 2016: $495
- First area, 2021: $715
- Second area, 2011: $519
- Second area, 2016: $587
- Second area, 2021: $727
- First area, 2011: $836
- First area, 2016: $1,093
- First area, 2021: $1,516
- Second area, 2011: $1,220
- Second area, 2016: $1,406
- Second area, 2021: $1,728
- First area, 2011: $875
- First area, 2016: $1,229
- First area, 2021: $1,641
- Second area, 2011: $1,276
- Second area, 2016: $1,516
- Second area, 2021: $1,775
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $368
- Second area, 2011: $235
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $315
- First area, 2011: $1,408
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,955
- Second area, 2011: $784
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,338
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Beechwood with nearby areas
Compare Rosewood with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beechwood vs Rosewood [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10248/beechwood/vs/SAL13428/rosewood