Compare
Alstonville vs Uralba
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.3 km apart · Alstonville profile · Uralba profile
Alstonville Uralba
Alstonville and Uralba are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with very different layouts. Alstonville is a larger, more urban centre where 62.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services, making it somewhat walkable. In contrast, Uralba is car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of these amenities. There are also notable differences among First Nations residents; in Uralba, the typical personal income is far higher at $1,624 compared to $550 in Alstonville, and residents are far older, with a typical age of 39 compared to 24.
Both areas share a similar international makeup, with about 12% of people born overseas. While Alstonville has a higher share of renters at 23.1% and more people living alone, Uralba has a higher proportion of separate houses at 97.0%. The two areas are both significantly older than the national figure, though Alstonville has a higher share of people aged 65 and over at 32.3%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,648
- First area, 2016: 5,739
- First area, 2021: 5,912
- Second area, 2011: 208
- Second area, 2016: 216
- Second area, 2021: 266
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 55 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Alstonville: 2.1% males, 3.8% females; 85+ in Uralba: 0.0% males, 2.3% females
- 80–84 in Alstonville: 2.1% males, 3.2% females; 80–84 in Uralba: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Alstonville: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Uralba: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 70–74 in Alstonville: 2.9% males, 4.3% females; 70–74 in Uralba: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Alstonville: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 65–69 in Uralba: 5.7% males, 5.7% females
- 60–64 in Alstonville: 3.1% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Uralba: 6.1% males, 7.6% females
- 55–59 in Alstonville: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Uralba: 6.1% males, 4.6% females
- 50–54 in Alstonville: 2.8% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Uralba: 1.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Alstonville: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Uralba: 5.0% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Alstonville: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Uralba: 1.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Alstonville: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Uralba: 2.3% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Alstonville: 1.9% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Uralba: 1.1% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Alstonville: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Uralba: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Alstonville: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Uralba: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Alstonville: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Uralba: 3.8% males, 1.1% females
- 10–14 in Alstonville: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Uralba: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Alstonville: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Uralba: 1.1% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Alstonville: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Uralba: 1.1% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $477
- First area, 2016: $570
- First area, 2021: $671
- Second area, 2011: $475
- Second area, 2016: $654
- Second area, 2021: $794
- First area, 2011: $888
- First area, 2016: $1,069
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2011: $900
- Second area, 2016: $1,402
- Second area, 2021: $1,812
- First area, 2011: $1,121
- First area, 2016: $1,361
- First area, 2021: $1,690
- Second area, 2011: $1,375
- Second area, 2016: $1,421
- Second area, 2021: $2,166
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $265
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $225
- Second area, 2021: $265
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,560
- First area, 2021: $1,730
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,967
- Second area, 2021: $1,957
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Alstonville with nearby areas
Compare Uralba with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Alstonville vs Uralba [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10046/alstonville/vs/SAL14068/uralba