Compare
Bunbury vs Rockingham
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 92 km apart · Bunbury profile · Rockingham profile
Bunbury Rockingham
Rockingham and Bunbury are both large Western Australian hubs, though they differ in layout and demographics. Rockingham is more compact and connected, with a typical resident aged 36 and 30.4% born overseas. It is more walkable, with 91.4% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. Bunbury is more spread out, and its residents are noticeably older, with a typical age of 41 and 18.8% of the population aged 65 and over. This area also has a higher share of outright home ownership at 32.0% compared to 24.9% in Rockingham.
Since 2011, several gaps between the two have widened, such as the age difference and the share of people who have finished Year 12. At the same time, they share very similar proportions of First Nations people and typical weekly personal incomes, which sit around $786 in Rockingham and $745 in Bunbury. Both areas also have similar rates of adults with a bachelor degree or higher, though Rockingham has seen much faster population growth recently, rising by 13.8% since 2021.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 94,386
- First area, 2016: 102,644
- First area, 2021: 107,549
- Second area, 2011: 104,105
- Second area, 2016: 125,114
- Second area, 2021: 135,678
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bunbury: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Rockingham: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Bunbury: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Rockingham: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Bunbury: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Rockingham: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Bunbury: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Rockingham: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Bunbury: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Rockingham: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Bunbury: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Rockingham: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Bunbury: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Rockingham: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Bunbury: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Rockingham: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bunbury: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Rockingham: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Rockingham: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Rockingham: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Bunbury: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Rockingham: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Bunbury: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Rockingham: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Bunbury: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Rockingham: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Bunbury: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Rockingham: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Bunbury: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Rockingham: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Bunbury: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Rockingham: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Bunbury: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Rockingham: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $597
- First area, 2016: $643
- First area, 2021: $745
- Second area, 2011: $620
- Second area, 2016: $682
- Second area, 2021: $786
- First area, 2011: $1,343
- First area, 2016: $1,396
- First area, 2021: $1,550
- Second area, 2011: $1,410
- Second area, 2016: $1,555
- Second area, 2021: $1,724
- First area, 2011: $1,615
- First area, 2016: $1,695
- First area, 2021: $1,962
- Second area, 2011: $1,656
- Second area, 2016: $1,812
- Second area, 2021: $2,077
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $255
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,616
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Bunbury with nearby areas
Compare Rockingham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bunbury vs Rockingham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/50102/bunbury/vs/50705/rockingham