Compare
Manningham - West vs Whitehorse - West
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 6.8 km apart · Manningham - West profile · Whitehorse - West profile
Manningham - West Whitehorse - West
Whitehorse - West and Manningham - West are neighbouring areas with similar populations, but they differ in their housing and demographics. Manningham - West has a noticeably older population, with a typical resident aged 43 compared to 38 in Whitehorse - West. Homes in Manningham - West are also larger, with 81.9% having three or more bedrooms, whereas Whitehorse - West has 68.8%. In contrast, Whitehorse - West is more walkable; 100% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed and 97.9% are within a 15 minute walk of groceries, compared to 89.1% and 87.4% in Manningham - West.
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, though some gaps are narrowing. The difference in the share of people using another language at home has shrunk to 11 points, and the gap in home ownership has also fallen. They remain very alike in other ways, such as having almost the same share of children under 15 (around 15-16%) and nearly identical typical weekly household incomes, both sitting around $1,800.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 85,907
- First area, 2016: 90,369
- First area, 2021: 98,386
- Second area, 2011: 94,914
- Second area, 2016: 102,040
- Second area, 2021: 107,187
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Manningham - West: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Whitehorse - West: 1.2% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Manningham - West: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Whitehorse - West: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Manningham - West: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Whitehorse - West: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Manningham - West: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Whitehorse - West: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Manningham - West: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Whitehorse - West: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Manningham - West: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Whitehorse - West: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Manningham - West: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Whitehorse - West: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Manningham - West: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Whitehorse - West: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Manningham - West: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Whitehorse - West: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Manningham - West: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Whitehorse - West: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Manningham - West: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Whitehorse - West: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Manningham - West: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Whitehorse - West: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Manningham - West: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Whitehorse - West: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Manningham - West: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Whitehorse - West: 4.5% males, 4.1% females
- 15–19 in Manningham - West: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Whitehorse - West: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Manningham - West: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Whitehorse - West: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Manningham - West: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Whitehorse - West: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Manningham - West: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Whitehorse - West: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $547
- First area, 2016: $604
- First area, 2021: $732
- Second area, 2011: $544
- Second area, 2016: $595
- Second area, 2021: $765
- First area, 2011: $1,387
- First area, 2016: $1,542
- First area, 2021: $1,810
- Second area, 2011: $1,295
- Second area, 2016: $1,471
- Second area, 2021: $1,790
- First area, 2011: $1,609
- First area, 2016: $1,781
- First area, 2021: $2,132
- Second area, 2011: $1,702
- Second area, 2016: $1,929
- Second area, 2021: $2,285
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $417
- First area, 2021: $462
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $381
- Second area, 2021: $412
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,400
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Manningham - West with nearby areas
Compare Whitehorse - West with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Manningham - West vs Whitehorse - West [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/20702/manningham-west/vs/20703/whitehorse-west