Compare
Latrobe Valley vs Casey - South
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 101 km apart · Latrobe Valley profile · Casey - South profile
Latrobe Valley Casey - South
Latrobe Valley and Casey - South are two very different Victorian regions. Casey - South is a fast-growing area where 42.9% of people were born overseas and 43.1% use a language other than English at home. In contrast, Latrobe Valley has a much smaller overseas-born population at 12.8% and only 6.6% use another language. Residents in Latrobe Valley are far older, with a typical age of 42 compared to 32 in Casey - South, and a much higher share of people aged 65 and over (21.1% versus 8.7%).
The gap in the typical age of residents has widened since 2011, growing from seven years to ten years. Both areas share some similarities, such as similar numbers of First Nations people and almost identical average school advantage scores. However, they differ in housing; Latrobe Valley has far more homes owned outright (37.3% versus 17.9%) and a typical monthly mortgage payment that is far lower than the $1,950 seen in Casey - South.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 72,217
- First area, 2016: 73,099
- First area, 2021: 77,168
- Second area, 2011: 128,361
- Second area, 2016: 168,177
- Second area, 2021: 227,950
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Latrobe Valley: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Casey - South: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Latrobe Valley: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Casey - South: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Latrobe Valley: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Casey - South: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 70–74 in Latrobe Valley: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Casey - South: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 65–69 in Latrobe Valley: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Casey - South: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 60–64 in Latrobe Valley: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Casey - South: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Latrobe Valley: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Casey - South: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Latrobe Valley: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Casey - South: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Latrobe Valley: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Casey - South: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Latrobe Valley: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Casey - South: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Latrobe Valley: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Casey - South: 4.7% males, 4.8% females
- 30–34 in Latrobe Valley: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Casey - South: 4.1% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Latrobe Valley: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Casey - South: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Latrobe Valley: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Casey - South: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Latrobe Valley: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Casey - South: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Latrobe Valley: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Casey - South: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Latrobe Valley: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Casey - South: 4.4% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Latrobe Valley: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Casey - South: 4.4% males, 4.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $468
- First area, 2016: $544
- First area, 2021: $654
- Second area, 2011: $588
- Second area, 2016: $661
- Second area, 2021: $804
- First area, 2011: $943
- First area, 2016: $1,077
- First area, 2021: $1,259
- Second area, 2011: $1,339
- Second area, 2016: $1,581
- Second area, 2021: $1,955
- First area, 2011: $1,236
- First area, 2016: $1,414
- First area, 2021: $1,677
- Second area, 2011: $1,428
- Second area, 2016: $1,647
- Second area, 2021: $2,039
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $160
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $237
- Second area, 2011: $291
- Second area, 2016: $341
- Second area, 2021: $386
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,200
- First area, 2021: $1,213
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,749
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Latrobe Valley with nearby areas
Compare Casey - South with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Latrobe Valley vs Casey - South [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/20504/latrobe-valley/vs/21203/casey-south