Compare
Hughes vs O'Malley
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Hughes profile · O'Malley profile
Hughes O'Malley
Hughes and O'Malley are neighbouring areas in the ACT, but they differ in their local feel and demographics. O'Malley has a far older population, with a typical resident aged 51 compared to 43 in Hughes. It is also much more culturally diverse, with 43.6% of people born overseas and 43.2% using another language at home, whereas these figures are 25.5% and 15.8% in Hughes. O'Malley is also wealthier and more established, with a typical weekly income of $4,476 and 57.2% of homes owned outright, compared to $2,797 and 36.5% in Hughes.
Both areas are equally advantaged and have identical rates of adults working or looking for work at 61.4%. While they share these high-level trends, their layout differs; Hughes is very walkable with most homes within a short stroll of shops and health services. In contrast, O'Malley is somewhat walkable and is dominated by large separate houses, 96.5% of which are detached. Over time, the gaps in age and income between the two areas have widened.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,956
- First area, 2016: 2,990
- First area, 2021: 3,210
- Second area, 2011: 873
- Second area, 2016: 991
- Second area, 2021: 928
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hughes: 2.1% males, 4.3% females; 85+ in O'Malley: 1.7% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Hughes: 1.3% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in O'Malley: 2.6% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Hughes: 1.4% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in O'Malley: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 70–74 in Hughes: 2.8% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in O'Malley: 4.1% males, 4.4% females
- 65–69 in Hughes: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in O'Malley: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Hughes: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in O'Malley: 3.3% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Hughes: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in O'Malley: 4.1% males, 4.9% females
- 50–54 in Hughes: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in O'Malley: 4.5% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Hughes: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in O'Malley: 3.0% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Hughes: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in O'Malley: 2.4% males, 1.4% females
- 35–39 in Hughes: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in O'Malley: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 30–34 in Hughes: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in O'Malley: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 25–29 in Hughes: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in O'Malley: 3.2% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Hughes: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in O'Malley: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Hughes: 2.4% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in O'Malley: 2.8% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Hughes: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in O'Malley: 2.9% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Hughes: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in O'Malley: 1.8% males, 1.4% females
- 0–4 in Hughes: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in O'Malley: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,008
- First area, 2016: $1,132
- First area, 2021: $1,298
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,310
- Second area, 2021: $1,497
- First area, 2011: $1,898
- First area, 2016: $2,274
- First area, 2021: $2,797
- Second area, 2011: $2,895
- Second area, 2016: $3,513
- Second area, 2021: $4,476
- First area, 2011: $2,680
- First area, 2016: $3,058
- First area, 2021: $3,669
- Second area, 2011: $2,911
- Second area, 2016: $3,819
- Second area, 2021: $4,567
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $325
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $975
- Second area, 2016: $941
- Second area, 2021: $975
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,700
- Second area, 2011: $3,750
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $3,413
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.60
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Hughes with nearby areas
Compare O'Malley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hughes vs O'Malley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801091103/hughes/vs/801091107/o-malley