Compare
Russell vs Fyshwick
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Russell profile · Fyshwick profile
Russell Fyshwick
Fyshwick and Russell are both sparsely populated areas. Fyshwick is a business hub with 1,555 businesses, while Russell has none. The two neighbours differ sharply in accessibility; Fyshwick has a very walkable score of 6.6 and a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (99.3%) and health services (26.5%). In contrast, Russell is more car-dependent with a somewhat walkable score of 5.8, though it is far higher in the share of homes within 15 minutes of a school (100%).
Both areas are identical in that 100% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park. They also share the same number of public transport routes and the same average rainfall and temperature. However, Russell provides much better access to the wider region, with far more people reachable within 45 minutes by transit (50,143) compared to Fyshwick (6,631).
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2016: 56
- Second area, 2021: 52
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- Second area, 2016: $489
- Second area, 2021: $599
- Second area, 2016: $2,249
- Second area, 2021: $1,374
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Russell with nearby areas
Compare Fyshwick with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Russell vs Fyshwick [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801051128/russell/vs/801061130/fyshwick