Compare
Dickson vs O'Connor
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · Dickson profile · O'Connor profile
Dickson O'Connor
O'Connor (ACT) and Dickson are neighbouring areas with very different housing and growth patterns. O'Connor (ACT) is more established, with a much higher share of separate houses (66.0% compared to 29.6%) and homes with three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Dickson is growing rapidly, with a population increase of 27.2% since 2021 and a much higher proportion of people who moved there in the last five years (70.8%). Dickson also has a far higher number of school enrolments (2,987) and much larger average school sizes compared to O'Connor (ACT).
Both areas share a similar typical weekly income of around $1,300 and have a very high level of education and job skills. Life in both places is highly walkable, though the nature of that walkability differs; O'Connor (ACT) has more parks, while Dickson has more food and drink options. Over time, some gaps have widened, such as the difference in the typical age of residents, which has grown to five years since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,139
- First area, 2016: 2,149
- First area, 2021: 3,292
- Second area, 2011: 5,251
- Second area, 2016: 5,481
- Second area, 2021: 5,917
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 31 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dickson: 0.5% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in O'Connor: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Dickson: 0.2% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in O'Connor: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Dickson: 0.9% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in O'Connor: 1.0% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Dickson: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in O'Connor: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Dickson: 1.0% males, 0.9% females; 65–69 in O'Connor: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Dickson: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 60–64 in O'Connor: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Dickson: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 55–59 in O'Connor: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Dickson: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in O'Connor: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Dickson: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in O'Connor: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Dickson: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in O'Connor: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Dickson: 5.0% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in O'Connor: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Dickson: 6.2% males, 6.1% females; 30–34 in O'Connor: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Dickson: 7.6% males, 8.4% females; 25–29 in O'Connor: 4.5% males, 4.6% females
- 20–24 in Dickson: 6.6% males, 8.8% females; 20–24 in O'Connor: 5.7% males, 6.4% females
- 15–19 in Dickson: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in O'Connor: 3.3% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Dickson: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 10–14 in O'Connor: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Dickson: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in O'Connor: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Dickson: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in O'Connor: 2.1% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $806
- First area, 2016: $896
- First area, 2021: $1,303
- Second area, 2011: $967
- Second area, 2016: $1,026
- Second area, 2021: $1,261
- First area, 2011: $1,660
- First area, 2016: $1,735
- First area, 2021: $2,277
- Second area, 2011: $1,980
- Second area, 2016: $2,129
- Second area, 2021: $2,518
- First area, 2011: $2,046
- First area, 2016: $2,350
- First area, 2021: $2,895
- Second area, 2011: $2,645
- Second area, 2016: $2,861
- Second area, 2021: $3,463
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $368
- First area, 2021: $500
- Second area, 2011: $400
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $451
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,084
- First area, 2021: $1,904
- Second area, 2011: $2,422
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Dickson with nearby areas
Compare O'Connor with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dickson vs O'Connor [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801051054/dickson/vs/801051058/o-connor