Compare
Latham vs Macgregor
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · Latham profile · Macgregor profile
Latham Macgregor
Macgregor (ACT) and Latham are neighbouring areas with distinct profiles. Macgregor (ACT) is a younger place, with a typical resident aged 34 and 24.3% of the population being children under 15. It is also more diverse, with more people born overseas (26.4%) and using another language at home (24.5%). In contrast, Latham is much more walkable, described as very walkable, with 99.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. Home ownership also differs, as homes owned outright are far higher in Latham at 31.9% compared to 20.7% in Macgregor (ACT).
Everyday life is similar in both areas, with nearly identical typical weekly family incomes and shares of people who have served in the Defence Force. Both areas also have about the same percentage of people with no religion, sitting around 43%. While they share these commonalities, the two are drifting apart in some ways; the gaps in language use and the proportion of children have both widened since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,603
- First area, 2016: 3,634
- First area, 2021: 3,767
- Second area, 2011: 5,506
- Second area, 2016: 6,796
- Second area, 2021: 7,049
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Latham: 0.4% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Macgregor: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Latham: 0.7% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Macgregor: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Latham: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Macgregor: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Latham: 2.3% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Macgregor: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Latham: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Macgregor: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Latham: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Macgregor: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Latham: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Macgregor: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in Latham: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Macgregor: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Latham: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Macgregor: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Latham: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Macgregor: 4.4% males, 4.8% females
- 35–39 in Latham: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Macgregor: 5.3% males, 5.3% females
- 30–34 in Latham: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Macgregor: 4.1% males, 4.5% females
- 25–29 in Latham: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Macgregor: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Latham: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Macgregor: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Latham: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Macgregor: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Latham: 3.7% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Macgregor: 4.1% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Latham: 4.1% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Macgregor: 4.3% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Latham: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Macgregor: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $859
- First area, 2016: $903
- First area, 2021: $1,089
- Second area, 2011: $935
- Second area, 2016: $1,043
- Second area, 2021: $1,172
- First area, 2011: $1,721
- First area, 2016: $1,859
- First area, 2021: $2,125
- Second area, 2011: $1,901
- Second area, 2016: $2,063
- Second area, 2021: $2,344
- First area, 2011: $1,960
- First area, 2016: $2,172
- First area, 2021: $2,495
- Second area, 2011: $2,073
- Second area, 2016: $2,249
- Second area, 2021: $2,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $351
- First area, 2016: $370
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $390
- Second area, 2016: $392
- Second area, 2021: $464
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Latham with nearby areas
Compare Macgregor with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Latham vs Macgregor [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801011017/latham/vs/801011019/macgregor