Compare
Canning Vale Commercial vs Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.2 km apart · Canning Vale Commercial profile · Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne profile
Canning Vale Commercial Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne
Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne and Canning Vale Commercial are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne is a residential hub of over 14,500 people where the typical weekly household income is $2,051. In contrast, Canning Vale Commercial is sparsely populated with only 3 residents, and its typical weekly household income is much lower at $225. This difference in use is clear in their walkability; Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne is very walkable, with 97.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, while only 4.4% of homes in Canning Vale Commercial have the same access.
Both areas share the same local climate and terrain, with identical average temperatures and rainfall. They have tracked similarly since 2011 in terms of their basic infrastructure, as both maintain a high proportion of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. While Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne is much more integrated for daily life, Canning Vale Commercial remains a largely non-residential space focused on business.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 0
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 3
- Second area, 2011: 13,158
- Second area, 2016: 13,486
- Second area, 2021: 14,518
- First area, 2021: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 75–79 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 1.8% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Canning Vale Commercial: 100.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 2.0% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 4.4% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Canning Vale Commercial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2021: $349
- Second area, 2011: $615
- Second area, 2016: $645
- Second area, 2021: $791
- First area, 2021: $225
- Second area, 2011: $1,535
- Second area, 2016: $1,693
- Second area, 2021: $2,051
- Second area, 2011: $1,917
- Second area, 2016: $2,024
- Second area, 2021: $2,443
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 1.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $208
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $2,069
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Canning Vale Commercial with nearby areas
Compare Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Canning Vale Commercial vs Riverton - Shelley - Rossmoyne [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/506031126/canning-vale-commercial/vs/506031129/riverton-shelley-rossmoyne