Compare
Kings Park vs Mount Hawthorn - Leederville
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.6 km apart · Kings Park profile · Mount Hawthorn - Leederville profile
Kings Park Mount Hawthorn - Leederville
Mount Hawthorn - Leederville is a populated residential hub, while Kings Park (WA) is sparsely populated. These neighbouring areas differ sharply in age and lifestyle; the typical resident in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville is 37, whereas they are 61 in Kings Park (WA). Families are common in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville, where 19.3% of people are children under 15, compared to 0.0% in Kings Park (WA). Financials also vary, with typical weekly household incomes far higher in Kings Park (WA) at $4,799, compared to $2,632 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville.
Since 2011, the gap in income and home loan payments has widened significantly. Despite these shifting trends, both areas are highly advantaged and sit about 8 minutes from the city. They are also alike in their access to nature, as 100% of homes in both areas are within a 15-minute walk of a park. However, their overall walkability differs, with Mount Hawthorn - Leederville described as a walker's paradise and Kings Park (WA) as somewhat walkable.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 33
- First area, 2016: 23
- First area, 2021: 48
- Second area, 2011: 10,298
- Second area, 2016: 10,708
- Second area, 2021: 11,872
- First area, 2011: 58 yrs
- First area, 2016: 65 yrs
- First area, 2021: 61 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 5.7% females; 85+ in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 0.6% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 0.4% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Kings Park: 13.2% males, 9.4% females; 75–79 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Kings Park: 5.7% males, 7.5% females; 70–74 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 65–69 in Kings Park: 5.7% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Kings Park: 5.7% males, 7.5% females; 60–64 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Kings Park: 17.0% males, 5.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 11.3% females; 50–54 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 4.4% males, 4.7% females
- 30–34 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 4.2% males, 4.6% females
- 25–29 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.5% males, 4.3% females
- 20–24 in Kings Park: 5.7% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Kings Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Hawthorn - Leederville: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,499
- First area, 2021: $2,150
- Second area, 2011: $934
- Second area, 2016: $1,096
- Second area, 2021: $1,280
- First area, 2011: $1,916
- First area, 2016: $3,666
- First area, 2021: $4,799
- Second area, 2011: $1,939
- Second area, 2016: $2,299
- Second area, 2021: $2,632
- First area, 2011: $3,666
- First area, 2016: $3,249
- First area, 2021: $4,874
- Second area, 2011: $2,544
- Second area, 2016: $2,851
- Second area, 2021: $3,367
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.9
- First area, 2016: 1.6
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $935
- First area, 2016: $1,000
- First area, 2021: $1,000
- Second area, 2011: $390
- Second area, 2016: $440
- Second area, 2021: $425
- First area, 2011: $7,250
- First area, 2021: $9,999
- Second area, 2011: $2,362
- Second area, 2016: $2,427
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kings Park with nearby areas
Compare Mount Hawthorn - Leederville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kings Park vs Mount Hawthorn - Leederville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/503021037/kings-park/vs/503021038/mount-hawthorn-leederville