Compare
Claremont vs Cottesloe
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Claremont profile · Cottesloe profile
Claremont Cottesloe
Claremont (WA) and Cottesloe are neighbouring areas with very different housing and school landscapes. Cottesloe is dominated by separate houses, which make up 69.1% of homes, while they account for only 39.0% of those in Claremont (WA). Incomes are also notably different; the typical weekly household income in Cottesloe is $3,351, which is far higher than the $2,068 typical in Claremont (WA). When it comes to education, Claremont (WA) has far more schools and a much larger student population, with an average school size of 827 compared to just 348 in Cottesloe.
The gap in typical household incomes has widened since 2011, but the two areas share several other traits. Both have a typical resident age of 44 and nearly identical numbers of businesses. They also share the same top rating for education and job skills. While Claremont (WA) has more public transport departures and more people born overseas, both areas sit well above the national figure for adults with a bachelor degree or higher.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,593
- First area, 2016: 8,148
- First area, 2021: 9,248
- Second area, 2011: 7,399
- Second area, 2016: 7,375
- Second area, 2021: 7,750
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Claremont: 1.7% males, 3.2% females; 85+ in Cottesloe: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Claremont: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Cottesloe: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Claremont: 2.4% males, 3.2% females; 75–79 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Claremont: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Cottesloe: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Cottesloe: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Cottesloe: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Cottesloe: 3.7% males, 4.3% females
- 45–49 in Claremont: 2.6% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Claremont: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Claremont: 2.4% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Claremont: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Cottesloe: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Claremont: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Cottesloe: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Claremont: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Cottesloe: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Claremont: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Cottesloe: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Claremont: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Cottesloe: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Claremont: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 5–9 in Cottesloe: 2.7% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Claremont: 2.2% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Cottesloe: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $825
- First area, 2016: $964
- First area, 2021: $1,115
- Second area, 2011: $1,036
- Second area, 2016: $1,231
- Second area, 2021: $1,458
- First area, 2011: $1,673
- First area, 2016: $1,935
- First area, 2021: $2,068
- Second area, 2011: $2,495
- Second area, 2016: $2,680
- Second area, 2021: $3,351
- First area, 2011: $2,573
- First area, 2016: $2,821
- First area, 2021: $3,154
- Second area, 2011: $2,795
- Second area, 2016: $3,662
- Second area, 2021: $4,593
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $375
- First area, 2016: $430
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $475
- Second area, 2016: $550
- Second area, 2021: $550
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,800
- Second area, 2011: $2,800
- Second area, 2016: $3,250
- Second area, 2021: $3,925
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Claremont with nearby areas
Compare Cottesloe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Claremont vs Cottesloe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/503011031/claremont/vs/503011032/cottesloe