Compare
Ceduna vs Quorn - Lake Gilles
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 335 km apart · Ceduna profile · Quorn - Lake Gilles profile
Ceduna Quorn - Lake Gilles
Ceduna and Quorn - Lake Gilles are both sparsely populated areas of South Australia, but they differ in their demographics and housing. Ceduna is much younger and has a far higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 24.1%, compared to 11.0% in Quorn - Lake Gilles. The two areas also differ in how people live; renting is far more common in Ceduna (39.5%), while homes in Quorn - Lake Gilles are far more likely to be owned outright (46.9%).
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the share of people born overseas, which sits around 8%. While they share a similar overall level of advantage, the gap in typical age has widened since 2011, with residents now far older in Quorn - Lake Gilles. At the same time, Ceduna has become more walkable, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (54.6%) and health services (36.9%) than in Quorn - Lake Gilles.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,642
- First area, 2016: 2,556
- First area, 2021: 2,697
- Second area, 2011: 2,272
- Second area, 2016: 2,134
- Second area, 2021: 2,142
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ceduna: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 1.4% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Ceduna: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Ceduna: 2.0% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 3.3% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Ceduna: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 4.8% males, 4.5% females
- 65–69 in Ceduna: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 5.3% males, 4.7% females
- 60–64 in Ceduna: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 5.6% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Ceduna: 3.1% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 4.1% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Ceduna: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Ceduna: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.2% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Ceduna: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 35–39 in Ceduna: 2.5% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 30–34 in Ceduna: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Ceduna: 4.3% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Ceduna: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Ceduna: 2.7% males, 2.0% females; 15–19 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 1.9% males, 1.8% females
- 10–14 in Ceduna: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.0% males, 1.5% females
- 5–9 in Ceduna: 4.1% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Ceduna: 3.2% males, 4.1% females; 0–4 in Quorn - Lake Gilles: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $600
- First area, 2016: $711
- First area, 2021: $788
- Second area, 2011: $482
- Second area, 2016: $557
- Second area, 2021: $643
- First area, 2011: $1,076
- First area, 2016: $1,282
- First area, 2021: $1,406
- Second area, 2011: $878
- Second area, 2016: $920
- Second area, 2021: $1,047
- First area, 2011: $1,389
- First area, 2016: $1,552
- First area, 2021: $1,858
- Second area, 2011: $1,172
- Second area, 2016: $1,269
- Second area, 2021: $1,478
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $147
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2011: $120
- Second area, 2016: $140
- Second area, 2021: $175
- First area, 2011: $1,203
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,251
- Second area, 2011: $1,000
- Second area, 2016: $950
- Second area, 2021: $964
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Ceduna with nearby areas
Compare Quorn - Lake Gilles with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ceduna vs Quorn - Lake Gilles [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/406011129/ceduna/vs/406021140/quorn-lake-gilles