Compare
Ashfield - Kepnock vs Bundaberg East - Kalkie
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Ashfield - Kepnock profile · Bundaberg East - Kalkie profile
Ashfield - Kepnock Bundaberg East - Kalkie
Bundaberg East - Kalkie and Ashfield - Kepnock are neighbouring areas that differ mostly in their local services and accessibility. Bundaberg East - Kalkie is more walkable, with a score of 6.1 (very walkable) compared to 5.1 (somewhat walkable) for Ashfield - Kepnock. It also has far more businesses (474 compared to 219) and a much higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services (75.7% versus 1.2%). In contrast, Ashfield - Kepnock has much larger schools, with an average size of 960 students compared to 430 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie.
These areas share a very similar profile in terms of their typical household incomes and the age of their residents, who are around 40 to 41 years old. Both areas also have a high number of separate houses and a similar share of residents born overseas, which is well above the national figure. Since 2011, the gaps between them have narrowed for several measures, including the proportion of adults working or looking for work and the share of people aged 65 and over.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,978
- First area, 2016: 5,229
- First area, 2021: 5,659
- Second area, 2011: 5,216
- Second area, 2016: 5,475
- Second area, 2021: 5,804
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ashfield - Kepnock: 1.4% males, 2.6% females; 85+ in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 1.5% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 1.1% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 60–64 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 3.3% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 3.8% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 3.6% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Ashfield - Kepnock: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Bundaberg East - Kalkie: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $441
- First area, 2016: $511
- First area, 2021: $657
- Second area, 2011: $492
- Second area, 2016: $561
- Second area, 2021: $661
- First area, 2011: $864
- First area, 2016: $1,027
- First area, 2021: $1,273
- Second area, 2011: $965
- Second area, 2016: $1,099
- Second area, 2021: $1,301
- First area, 2011: $1,003
- First area, 2016: $1,252
- First area, 2021: $1,565
- Second area, 2011: $1,217
- Second area, 2016: $1,318
- Second area, 2021: $1,642
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $230
- First area, 2016: $265
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $243
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2011: $1,498
- First area, 2016: $1,473
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,560
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,324
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Ashfield - Kepnock with nearby areas
Compare Bundaberg East - Kalkie with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ashfield - Kepnock vs Bundaberg East - Kalkie [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/319011492/ashfield-kepnock/vs/319011496/bundaberg-east-kalkie