Compare
Shailer Park vs Daisy Hill
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.9 km apart · Shailer Park profile · Daisy Hill profile
Shailer Park Daisy Hill
Shailer Park and Daisy Hill are neighbouring areas in Logan with very different levels of local convenience. Daisy Hill is far more walkable, with 77.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to only 41.0% in Shailer Park. Residents in Daisy Hill also have much better access to health services and public transport by foot. In contrast, Shailer Park has far better overall transit connectivity, with 59 public transport stops and 15 routes, while Daisy Hill has just 30 stops and 6 routes.
The gap in cultural diversity has widened since 2011, with Daisy Hill now seeing a well higher share of people born overseas (32.4%) and those using another language at home (19.9%). Despite this, the two areas remain very similar in their typical weekly personal incomes, which sit around $900. They also share a similar proportion of residents aged 65 and over, and both have about the same percentage of people who speak little or no English.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,275
- First area, 2016: 11,647
- First area, 2021: 12,073
- Second area, 2011: 6,254
- Second area, 2016: 6,638
- Second area, 2021: 6,897
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Shailer Park: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Daisy Hill: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Shailer Park: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Daisy Hill: 0.7% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Shailer Park: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Daisy Hill: 1.4% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Shailer Park: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Daisy Hill: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Shailer Park: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Daisy Hill: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Shailer Park: 3.0% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Daisy Hill: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Shailer Park: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Daisy Hill: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Shailer Park: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Daisy Hill: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Shailer Park: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Daisy Hill: 3.4% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Shailer Park: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Daisy Hill: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Shailer Park: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Daisy Hill: 3.9% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Shailer Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Daisy Hill: 3.1% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Shailer Park: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Daisy Hill: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Shailer Park: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Daisy Hill: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Shailer Park: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Daisy Hill: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Shailer Park: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Daisy Hill: 4.2% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Shailer Park: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Daisy Hill: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Shailer Park: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Daisy Hill: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $707
- First area, 2016: $783
- First area, 2021: $922
- Second area, 2011: $642
- Second area, 2016: $744
- Second area, 2021: $882
- First area, 2011: $1,770
- First area, 2016: $1,947
- First area, 2021: $2,225
- Second area, 2011: $1,458
- Second area, 2016: $1,724
- Second area, 2021: $2,036
- First area, 2011: $1,880
- First area, 2016: $2,064
- First area, 2021: $2,381
- Second area, 2011: $1,654
- Second area, 2016: $1,890
- Second area, 2021: $2,226
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $385
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,993
- Second area, 2011: $1,993
- Second area, 2016: $1,850
- Second area, 2021: $1,863
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Shailer Park with nearby areas
Compare Daisy Hill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Shailer Park vs Daisy Hill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/311051327/shailer-park/vs/311061329/daisy-hill