Compare
Boyne Island - Tannum Sands vs Clinton - New Auckland
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 16 km apart · Boyne Island - Tannum Sands profile · Clinton - New Auckland profile
Boyne Island - Tannum Sands Clinton - New Auckland
Clinton - New Auckland and Boyne Island - Tannum Sands are nearby Queensland areas with very different layouts. Boyne Island - Tannum Sands is much more walkable, with 67.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a "15-minute-city" walkshed compared to just 22% in Clinton - New Auckland. Residents in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands also have far better access to basics, with 66.3% of homes within a short walk of health services and groceries, and 58.2% near a school. In contrast, Clinton - New Auckland has a much younger population, with a typical age of 33 compared to 39 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands.
Daily life in both places shares many similarities, including typical weekly household incomes of around $1,900 and similar levels of university qualifications. While they share these commonalities, some gaps are shifting; for instance, the difference in the share of renters has narrowed since 2016. Both areas are also well below the national figure for people who speak a language other than English at home, though this is slightly more common in Clinton - New Auckland.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 9,901
- First area, 2021: 10,063
- Second area, 2016: 13,464
- Second area, 2021: 14,161
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Clinton - New Auckland: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Clinton - New Auckland: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 1.2% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Clinton - New Auckland: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Clinton - New Auckland: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Clinton - New Auckland: 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Clinton - New Auckland: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Clinton - New Auckland: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Clinton - New Auckland: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.6% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.7% males, 4.2% females
- 25–29 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Clinton - New Auckland: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 4.0% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Clinton - New Auckland: 4.5% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Clinton - New Auckland: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Boyne Island - Tannum Sands: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Clinton - New Auckland: 4.0% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $742
- First area, 2021: $855
- Second area, 2016: $761
- Second area, 2021: $828
- First area, 2016: $1,947
- First area, 2021: $1,948
- Second area, 2016: $1,868
- Second area, 2021: $1,890
- First area, 2016: $2,175
- First area, 2021: $2,295
- Second area, 2016: $2,116
- Second area, 2021: $2,185
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $295
- First area, 2016: $2,058
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,607
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Boyne Island - Tannum Sands with nearby areas
Compare Clinton - New Auckland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Boyne Island - Tannum Sands vs Clinton - New Auckland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/308051531/boyne-island-tannum-sands/vs/308051533/clinton-new-auckland