Compare
Emu Park vs Lakes Creek
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 27 km apart · Emu Park profile · Lakes Creek profile
Emu Park Lakes Creek
Emu Park and Lakes Creek are nearby Queensland areas with very different populations. Emu Park is an older community where the typical resident is 49, and 27.8% of people are aged 65 and over. In contrast, Lakes Creek is much younger, with a typical age of 35 and far fewer seniors. This age gap is reflected in their housing and workforce; residents in Emu Park are far more likely to own their homes outright (41.5%), while Lakes Creek has a much higher share of recent overseas arrivals (29.3%) and a larger proportion of adults working or looking for work (61.5%).
Since 2011, the gaps in age and home ownership have shifted, with the age difference narrowing slightly while the share of outright homeowners in Emu Park has grown further. Both areas are similar in other ways, such as having roughly the same unemployment rate and a high proportion of detached houses. They also share a lack of public transport, with no one in either area living within a 10-minute walk of a stop.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,544
- First area, 2016: 5,466
- First area, 2021: 5,798
- Second area, 2011: 5,061
- Second area, 2016: 4,876
- Second area, 2021: 4,880
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emu Park: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Lakes Creek: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Emu Park: 1.4% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Lakes Creek: 0.6% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Emu Park: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Lakes Creek: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Emu Park: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 70–74 in Lakes Creek: 2.0% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Emu Park: 4.3% males, 4.4% females; 65–69 in Lakes Creek: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Emu Park: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Lakes Creek: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Emu Park: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Lakes Creek: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Emu Park: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Lakes Creek: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Emu Park: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Lakes Creek: 2.6% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Emu Park: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Lakes Creek: 3.6% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Lakes Creek: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Emu Park: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Lakes Creek: 4.2% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Emu Park: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Lakes Creek: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Emu Park: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Lakes Creek: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Emu Park: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Lakes Creek: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Emu Park: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Lakes Creek: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Emu Park: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Lakes Creek: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Emu Park: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Lakes Creek: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $498
- First area, 2016: $557
- First area, 2021: $618
- Second area, 2011: $590
- Second area, 2016: $613
- Second area, 2021: $734
- First area, 2011: $960
- First area, 2016: $1,024
- First area, 2021: $1,203
- Second area, 2011: $1,150
- Second area, 2016: $1,184
- Second area, 2021: $1,374
- First area, 2011: $1,141
- First area, 2016: $1,262
- First area, 2021: $1,456
- Second area, 2011: $1,341
- Second area, 2016: $1,393
- Second area, 2021: $1,691
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $235
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,800
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,387
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Emu Park with nearby areas
Compare Lakes Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emu Park vs Lakes Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/308031207/emu-park/vs/308031211/lakes-creek