Compare
Earlville - Bayview Heights vs Mount Sheridan
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 3.9 km apart · Earlville - Bayview Heights profile · Mount Sheridan profile
Earlville - Bayview Heights Mount Sheridan
Mount Sheridan and Earlville - Bayview Heights are neighbouring areas with different housing and demographic profiles. Mount Sheridan is more focused on families, with a typical resident aged 37 and a much higher share of children under 15 (21.6%). This is consistent with its housing, where 98.7% of homes are separate houses and 95% have three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Earlville - Bayview Heights is older, with a typical age of 43, and has a much higher share of people living alone (28.8% compared to 18.1% in Mount Sheridan).
Both areas are effectively alike in their typical weekly family income, which sits around $2,000. While they share similar incomes, their access to local services differs; Earlville - Bayview Heights has a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (84.2%) and schools (68.2%). Over time, some of the gaps between the two have shifted, such as the age difference and the share of children, both of which have narrowed since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,996
- First area, 2016: 8,265
- First area, 2021: 8,376
- Second area, 2011: 7,994
- Second area, 2016: 8,271
- Second area, 2021: 8,678
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 1.0% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Mount Sheridan: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 1.3% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Mount Sheridan: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Mount Sheridan: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Mount Sheridan: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Mount Sheridan: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Mount Sheridan: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Mount Sheridan: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Mount Sheridan: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Mount Sheridan: 3.4% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Mount Sheridan: 2.9% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Mount Sheridan: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Mount Sheridan: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Mount Sheridan: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Mount Sheridan: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.1% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Mount Sheridan: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Mount Sheridan: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Mount Sheridan: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Earlville - Bayview Heights: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Mount Sheridan: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $620
- First area, 2016: $675
- First area, 2021: $789
- Second area, 2011: $681
- Second area, 2016: $742
- Second area, 2021: $857
- First area, 2011: $1,196
- First area, 2016: $1,266
- First area, 2021: $1,478
- Second area, 2011: $1,430
- Second area, 2016: $1,554
- Second area, 2021: $1,826
- First area, 2011: $1,483
- First area, 2016: $1,616
- First area, 2021: $1,967
- Second area, 2011: $1,562
- Second area, 2016: $1,705
- Second area, 2021: $2,018
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,600
- First area, 2021: $1,522
- Second area, 2011: $1,759
- Second area, 2016: $1,647
- Second area, 2021: $1,542
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Earlville - Bayview Heights with nearby areas
Compare Mount Sheridan with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Earlville - Bayview Heights vs Mount Sheridan [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/306021146/earlville-bayview-heights/vs/306021153/mount-sheridan