Compare
Salisbury - Nathan vs Rocklea - Acacia Ridge
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.2 km apart · Salisbury - Nathan profile · Rocklea - Acacia Ridge profile
Salisbury - Nathan Rocklea - Acacia Ridge
Rocklea - Acacia Ridge and Salisbury - Nathan are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Rocklea - Acacia Ridge is much more diverse, with 34.4% of people born overseas and 30.7% using a language other than English at home. It has a higher share of renters at 47.8% and more one-parent families (25.3%). In contrast, Salisbury - Nathan is more affluent; 28.6% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, and 34.2% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher. It also has much better access to essentials, with 90% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services, compared to just 18.7% in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have generally widened. The difference in high-income households and university qualifications has grown, as has the gap in overseas births and language diversity. Despite these diverging trends, they share a similar family feel, with both having a typical resident age of 34 and about 19% of their population being children under 15.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,153
- First area, 2016: 7,183
- First area, 2021: 7,562
- Second area, 2011: 8,707
- Second area, 2016: 9,561
- Second area, 2021: 9,711
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Salisbury - Nathan: 0.8% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.7% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Salisbury - Nathan: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Salisbury - Nathan: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.1% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Salisbury - Nathan: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Salisbury - Nathan: 1.7% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Salisbury - Nathan: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Salisbury - Nathan: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Salisbury - Nathan: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Salisbury - Nathan: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Salisbury - Nathan: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Salisbury - Nathan: 3.8% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Salisbury - Nathan: 4.8% males, 4.3% females; 30–34 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.7% males, 4.3% females
- 25–29 in Salisbury - Nathan: 4.0% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.5% males, 4.6% females
- 20–24 in Salisbury - Nathan: 4.5% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.0% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Salisbury - Nathan: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Salisbury - Nathan: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Salisbury - Nathan: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.9% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Salisbury - Nathan: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $543
- First area, 2016: $670
- First area, 2021: $903
- Second area, 2011: $464
- Second area, 2016: $520
- Second area, 2021: $659
- First area, 2011: $1,357
- First area, 2016: $1,614
- First area, 2021: $2,087
- Second area, 2011: $977
- Second area, 2016: $1,177
- Second area, 2021: $1,350
- First area, 2011: $1,622
- First area, 2016: $1,925
- First area, 2021: $2,525
- Second area, 2011: $1,098
- Second area, 2016: $1,275
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $310
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $385
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $335
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,994
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,582
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Salisbury - Nathan with nearby areas
Compare Rocklea - Acacia Ridge with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Salisbury - Nathan vs Rocklea - Acacia Ridge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/303041070/salisbury-nathan/vs/303051076/rocklea-acacia-ridge