Compare
Belmont - Gumdale vs Tingalpa
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.0 km apart · Belmont - Gumdale profile · Tingalpa profile
Belmont - Gumdale Tingalpa
Tingalpa and Belmont - Gumdale are neighbouring areas in Brisbane with very different layouts. Tingalpa is a much more walkable hub, where 93.7% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 82.6% are near a school. In contrast, Belmont - Gumdale is more car-dependent, with only 11.1% of homes within a short walk of a school and a far higher share of separate houses (93.4%). Financial profiles also differ; Belmont - Gumdale has a higher typical weekly household income of $2,588, while Tingalpa's is $1,983. A far higher share of households in Belmont - Gumdale earn $3,000 or more a week (40.1% compared to 24.9% in Tingalpa).
Both areas have a similar share of children under 15, which sits around 19% and is close to the national figure. While they share this family profile, other gaps are shifting. The difference in high-income households has widened since 2011, and the gap in university qualifications has also grown, with Belmont - Gumdale seeing a higher share of residents with a bachelor degree or higher. At the same time, the gap in outright home ownership has narrowed slightly.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,441
- First area, 2016: 7,375
- First area, 2021: 7,550
- Second area, 2011: 8,539
- Second area, 2016: 8,708
- Second area, 2021: 8,881
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Belmont - Gumdale: 0.5% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Tingalpa: 0.6% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Belmont - Gumdale: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Tingalpa: 0.9% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Belmont - Gumdale: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Tingalpa: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Belmont - Gumdale: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Tingalpa: 1.9% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Belmont - Gumdale: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Tingalpa: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Tingalpa: 2.4% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Tingalpa: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Tingalpa: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Tingalpa: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Tingalpa: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Belmont - Gumdale: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Tingalpa: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Belmont - Gumdale: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Tingalpa: 4.1% males, 4.2% females
- 25–29 in Belmont - Gumdale: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Tingalpa: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Tingalpa: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Belmont - Gumdale: 4.2% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Tingalpa: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Belmont - Gumdale: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Tingalpa: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Belmont - Gumdale: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Tingalpa: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Belmont - Gumdale: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Tingalpa: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $732
- First area, 2016: $811
- First area, 2021: $951
- Second area, 2011: $720
- Second area, 2016: $796
- Second area, 2021: $947
- First area, 2011: $1,929
- First area, 2016: $2,196
- First area, 2021: $2,588
- Second area, 2011: $1,474
- Second area, 2016: $1,690
- Second area, 2021: $1,983
- First area, 2011: $2,096
- First area, 2016: $2,293
- First area, 2021: $2,784
- Second area, 2011: $1,687
- Second area, 2016: $1,920
- Second area, 2021: $2,321
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $430
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $2,250
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,268
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $1,900
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Belmont - Gumdale with nearby areas
Compare Tingalpa with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Belmont - Gumdale vs Tingalpa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/301011002/belmont-gumdale/vs/301031018/tingalpa