Compare
Ashwood - Chadstone vs Oakleigh - Huntingdale
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.0 km apart · Ashwood - Chadstone profile · Oakleigh - Huntingdale profile
Ashwood - Chadstone Oakleigh - Huntingdale
Oakleigh - Huntingdale and Ashwood - Chadstone are neighbouring areas with distinct differences in transport and housing. Oakleigh - Huntingdale is far more connected, with 32 public transport routes and 149 stops, compared to 11 routes and 64 stops in Ashwood - Chadstone. It also has more separate houses, at 68.2% versus 58.2%. In contrast, Ashwood - Chadstone has a much higher First Nations language speaking population (17.3% compared to 3.5%) and a far higher First Nations unemployment rate (20.8% compared to 7.3%).
Both areas are very similar in their overall makeup, with about 43% of people born overseas and typical weekly household incomes sitting around $2,000. This shared foundation exists while some gaps are widening; the difference in the share of adults with bachelor degrees has grown since 2011, as has the gap in the number of people who identify as having no religion, which is now well higher in Ashwood - Chadstone.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,252
- First area, 2016: 18,298
- First area, 2021: 19,507
- Second area, 2011: 20,233
- Second area, 2016: 21,290
- Second area, 2021: 22,928
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ashwood - Chadstone: 1.0% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 1.2% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 4.1% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 4.7% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 25–29 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 4.9% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 5.1% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 4.1% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Ashwood - Chadstone: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Oakleigh - Huntingdale: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $544
- First area, 2016: $648
- First area, 2021: $871
- Second area, 2011: $537
- Second area, 2016: $632
- Second area, 2021: $841
- First area, 2011: $1,301
- First area, 2016: $1,554
- First area, 2021: $2,011
- Second area, 2011: $1,313
- Second area, 2016: $1,520
- Second area, 2021: $1,956
- First area, 2011: $1,627
- First area, 2016: $1,942
- First area, 2021: $2,449
- Second area, 2011: $1,550
- Second area, 2016: $1,845
- Second area, 2021: $2,331
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $415
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $371
- Second area, 2021: $415
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,963
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Ashwood - Chadstone with nearby areas
Compare Oakleigh - Huntingdale with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ashwood - Chadstone vs Oakleigh - Huntingdale [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/212051319/ashwood-chadstone/vs/212051326/oakleigh-huntingdale