Compare
Emerald - Cockatoo vs Pakenham - North West
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 15 km apart · Emerald - Cockatoo profile · Pakenham - North West profile
Emerald - Cockatoo Pakenham - North West
Emerald - Cockatoo and Pakenham - North West are nearby Victorian areas with very different profiles. Emerald - Cockatoo is an older, more established area where residents are far older, with a typical age of 41 compared to 32 in Pakenham - North West. It is much less diverse, with only 13.8% of people born overseas and 4.4% using another language at home. In contrast, Pakenham - North West has a much higher share of overseas-born residents at 28.9% and a far higher rate of people using another language at 26.0%. Pakenham - North West also sees far more rental properties (28.7%) and has a much higher proportion of people who moved there in the last five years (60.7%).
The gap in population growth is widening rapidly, as Pakenham - North West has grown by 38.8% since 2021, while Emerald - Cockatoo grew by just 1.3%. Despite these different speeds of change, they share a similar typical weekly personal income of around $870 to $879. They also have the same number of people per home, averaging 2.9, and very similar shares of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 17,509
- First area, 2016: 18,000
- First area, 2021: 18,633
- Second area, 2021: 7,479
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Emerald - Cockatoo: 0.5% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Pakenham - North West: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 0.8% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Pakenham - North West: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Pakenham - North West: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Pakenham - North West: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Pakenham - North West: 1.5% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Pakenham - North West: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 55–59 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.5% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Pakenham - North West: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Pakenham - North West: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.6% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Pakenham - North West: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Pakenham - North West: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Pakenham - North West: 4.8% males, 5.3% females
- 30–34 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Pakenham - North West: 4.7% males, 5.3% females
- 25–29 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Pakenham - North West: 4.1% males, 4.8% females
- 20–24 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.0% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Pakenham - North West: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Pakenham - North West: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Pakenham - North West: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 3.7% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Pakenham - North West: 5.0% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Emerald - Cockatoo: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Pakenham - North West: 4.8% males, 5.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $602
- First area, 2016: $700
- First area, 2021: $870
- Second area, 2021: $879
- First area, 2011: $1,447
- First area, 2016: $1,716
- First area, 2021: $2,176
- Second area, 2021: $1,887
- First area, 2011: $1,634
- First area, 2016: $1,915
- First area, 2021: $2,402
- Second area, 2021: $2,054
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $321
- First area, 2021: $370
- Second area, 2021: $366
- First area, 2011: $1,647
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,980
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Emerald - Cockatoo with nearby areas
Compare Pakenham - North West with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Emerald - Cockatoo vs Pakenham - North West [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/212011289/emerald-cockatoo/vs/212011550/pakenham-north-west