Compare
Bruthen - Omeo vs Paynesville
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 61 km apart · Bruthen - Omeo profile · Paynesville profile
Bruthen - Omeo Paynesville
Bruthen - Omeo and Paynesville are two Victorian areas with very different profiles. Paynesville is a retirement hub where residents are far older; the typical person is 61 and 42.9% of the population are seniors. This is contrasted by Bruthen - Omeo, where the typical age is 48 and children under 15 are well more common at 16.7%. Paynesville also offers much better walkability, with 75.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, compared to just 22.9% in Bruthen - Omeo.
Both areas are almost identical in their use of other languages at home, which sits at 3.1%. While they share this trait, other gaps are changing. The age difference has widened since 2011, with the gap in the senior population growing to 19 percentage points. Meanwhile, the share of people who identify as having no religion is now well higher in Bruthen - Omeo, and the gap between the two areas has widened over time.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,290
- First area, 2016: 7,743
- First area, 2021: 8,290
- Second area, 2011: 5,604
- Second area, 2016: 6,313
- Second area, 2021: 6,977
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 61 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bruthen - Omeo: 0.9% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Paynesville: 1.7% males, 2.4% females
- 80–84 in Bruthen - Omeo: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Paynesville: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Paynesville: 4.6% males, 4.2% females
- 70–74 in Bruthen - Omeo: 4.0% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Paynesville: 6.6% males, 6.6% females
- 65–69 in Bruthen - Omeo: 4.2% males, 3.8% females; 65–69 in Paynesville: 5.7% males, 6.1% females
- 60–64 in Bruthen - Omeo: 4.4% males, 4.5% females; 60–64 in Paynesville: 5.0% males, 5.2% females
- 55–59 in Bruthen - Omeo: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Paynesville: 3.2% males, 4.3% females
- 50–54 in Bruthen - Omeo: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Paynesville: 2.5% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Bruthen - Omeo: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Paynesville: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Paynesville: 1.6% males, 1.8% females
- 35–39 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 30–34 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Paynesville: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Paynesville: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Bruthen - Omeo: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Paynesville: 1.3% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Paynesville: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Bruthen - Omeo: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Paynesville: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 5–9 in Bruthen - Omeo: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Paynesville: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 0–4 in Bruthen - Omeo: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Paynesville: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $531
- First area, 2021: $669
- Second area, 2011: $427
- Second area, 2016: $492
- Second area, 2021: $571
- First area, 2011: $879
- First area, 2016: $1,082
- First area, 2021: $1,323
- Second area, 2011: $796
- Second area, 2016: $914
- Second area, 2021: $1,071
- First area, 2011: $1,038
- First area, 2016: $1,273
- First area, 2021: $1,619
- Second area, 2011: $948
- Second area, 2016: $1,145
- Second area, 2021: $1,314
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $140
- First area, 2016: $162
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $310
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,250
- First area, 2021: $1,343
- Second area, 2011: $1,170
- Second area, 2016: $1,207
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Bruthen - Omeo with nearby areas
Compare Paynesville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bruthen - Omeo vs Paynesville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/205021082/bruthen-omeo/vs/205021086/paynesville