Compare
Beechworth vs Bright - Mount Beauty
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 71 km apart · Beechworth profile · Bright - Mount Beauty profile
Beechworth Bright - Mount Beauty
Bright - Mount Beauty and Beechworth are two regional Victorian areas with distinct profiles. Bright - Mount Beauty is larger and more diverse, with 10.9% of residents arriving recently from overseas and 25.0% of First Nations people speaking a First Nations language. It also has far more businesses (1,212 compared to 548) and better public transport options, with 19 stops and 4 routes. In contrast, Beechworth is more walkable; a far higher share of its homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park (85.4% vs 66.0%), school (65.2% vs 48.7%), or health service (53.0% vs 36.1%).
More people in Beechworth provide unpaid care (14.7% vs 10.6%), a gap that has widened since 2011. Despite this, the two areas are very similar in other ways, including typical weekly household incomes, which sit around $1,400. They also share a similar proportion of children under 15 and a similar percentage of residents who have no religion.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,218
- First area, 2016: 4,569
- First area, 2021: 4,986
- Second area, 2011: 7,734
- Second area, 2016: 8,154
- Second area, 2021: 8,903
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beechworth: 0.9% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Bright - Mount Beauty: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Beechworth: 1.5% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Beechworth: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Beechworth: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Beechworth: 4.0% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Beechworth: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 4.1% males, 4.3% females
- 55–59 in Beechworth: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Beechworth: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Beechworth: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 45–49 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Beechworth: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Beechworth: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Beechworth: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 30–34 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Beechworth: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Beechworth: 1.6% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Beechworth: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.6% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Beechworth: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Beechworth: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Beechworth: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Bright - Mount Beauty: 2.2% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $498
- First area, 2016: $616
- First area, 2021: $766
- Second area, 2011: $488
- Second area, 2016: $590
- Second area, 2021: $768
- First area, 2011: $956
- First area, 2016: $1,173
- First area, 2021: $1,434
- Second area, 2011: $850
- Second area, 2016: $1,039
- Second area, 2021: $1,397
- First area, 2011: $1,179
- First area, 2016: $1,461
- First area, 2021: $1,899
- Second area, 2011: $1,090
- Second area, 2016: $1,336
- Second area, 2021: $1,826
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $190
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $175
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $298
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,430
- First area, 2021: $1,560
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Beechworth with nearby areas
Compare Bright - Mount Beauty with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beechworth vs Bright - Mount Beauty [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/204031068/beechworth/vs/204031069/bright-mount-beauty