Compare
Daylesford vs Castlemaine
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 26 km apart · Daylesford profile · Castlemaine profile
Daylesford Castlemaine
Castlemaine and Daylesford are nearby Victorian areas that offer very different levels of accessibility. Castlemaine is far more walkable, with 90.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park and 54% within reach of groceries, compared to 56.9% and 33.2% in Daylesford. Public transport is also much more available in Castlemaine, which has 192 weekly departures per 1,000 people and a typical walking distance to a stop of just 12 minutes, while Daylesford has 68.7 departures and a far longer typical walk of 78 minutes.
Both areas are very similar in their typical weekly personal incomes, which sit at $683 in Castlemaine and $703 in Daylesford. They also share a similar proportion of residents aged 65 and over, around 29%. While they track closely in many ways, some gaps have grown since 2011; for instance, residents in Daylesford are now noticeably older than those in Castlemaine, and the share of high-income households earning over $3,000 a week is well higher in Daylesford.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,393
- First area, 2016: 8,956
- First area, 2021: 9,955
- Second area, 2011: 9,733
- Second area, 2016: 10,583
- Second area, 2021: 11,352
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Daylesford: 1.0% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Castlemaine: 1.5% males, 2.7% females
- 80–84 in Daylesford: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Daylesford: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 3.2% females
- 70–74 in Daylesford: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Castlemaine: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 65–69 in Daylesford: 4.8% males, 5.1% females; 65–69 in Castlemaine: 3.9% males, 4.5% females
- 60–64 in Daylesford: 4.5% males, 5.1% females; 60–64 in Castlemaine: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Daylesford: 4.5% males, 4.6% females; 55–59 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Daylesford: 4.0% males, 4.4% females; 50–54 in Castlemaine: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Daylesford: 3.1% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Daylesford: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Castlemaine: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Daylesford: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Castlemaine: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Daylesford: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Castlemaine: 3.0% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Daylesford: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Daylesford: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Castlemaine: 1.8% males, 1.1% females
- 15–19 in Daylesford: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 15–19 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Daylesford: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Castlemaine: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Daylesford: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Castlemaine: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Daylesford: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Castlemaine: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $460
- First area, 2016: $550
- First area, 2021: $703
- Second area, 2011: $471
- Second area, 2016: $568
- Second area, 2021: $683
- First area, 2011: $842
- First area, 2016: $1,016
- First area, 2021: $1,343
- Second area, 2011: $813
- Second area, 2016: $965
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: $1,067
- First area, 2016: $1,311
- First area, 2021: $1,784
- Second area, 2011: $1,089
- Second area, 2016: $1,342
- Second area, 2021: $1,676
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $200
- First area, 2016: $266
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $265
- Second area, 2021: $310
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,340
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,277
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,408
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Daylesford with nearby areas
Compare Castlemaine with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Daylesford vs Castlemaine [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/201021011/daylesford/vs/202021027/castlemaine