Compare
Douglas Park - Appin vs Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Douglas Park - Appin profile · Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton profile
Douglas Park - Appin Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton
Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton and Douglas Park - Appin are nearby areas with a few sharp contrasts. Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton is much more walkable, with 52.7% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to just 12.8% in Douglas Park - Appin. It also has far more renters (23.0% versus 12.5%) and a higher number of one-parent families. In contrast, Douglas Park - Appin has a wealthier profile, where 36.5% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, compared to 23.4% in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton.
Both areas are similar in the share of people born overseas, which sits around the national figure at 11%. They are also alike in how many people use another language at home and their similar rates of home ownership. While they share these traits, the income gap has widened since 2011, with the typical weekly household income in Douglas Park - Appin now $598 higher than in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,064
- First area, 2016: 9,626
- First area, 2021: 11,112
- Second area, 2011: 15,369
- Second area, 2016: 16,790
- Second area, 2021: 18,987
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Douglas Park - Appin: 0.6% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 0.7% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Douglas Park - Appin: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Douglas Park - Appin: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Douglas Park - Appin: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Douglas Park - Appin: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Douglas Park - Appin: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Douglas Park - Appin: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Douglas Park - Appin: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Douglas Park - Appin: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Douglas Park - Appin: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Douglas Park - Appin: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Douglas Park - Appin: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Douglas Park - Appin: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Douglas Park - Appin: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Douglas Park - Appin: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Douglas Park - Appin: 4.0% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Douglas Park - Appin: 4.8% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Douglas Park - Appin: 4.3% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $650
- First area, 2016: $832
- First area, 2021: $959
- Second area, 2011: $577
- Second area, 2016: $696
- Second area, 2021: $829
- First area, 2011: $1,674
- First area, 2016: $2,170
- First area, 2021: $2,484
- Second area, 2011: $1,334
- Second area, 2016: $1,626
- Second area, 2021: $1,886
- First area, 2011: $1,821
- First area, 2016: $2,250
- First area, 2021: $2,624
- Second area, 2011: $1,548
- Second area, 2016: $1,849
- Second area, 2021: $2,169
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $490
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,175
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Douglas Park - Appin with nearby areas
Compare Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Douglas Park - Appin vs Picton - Tahmoor - Buxton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/123031446/douglas-park-appin/vs/123031447/picton-tahmoor-buxton