Compare
Chippendale vs Pyrmont
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · Chippendale profile · Pyrmont profile
Chippendale Pyrmont
Pyrmont and Chippendale are neighbouring inner-city areas with very different profiles. Pyrmont is older and wealthier, with a typical resident aged 37 and 40% of households earning $3,000 or more a week. In contrast, Chippendale is far younger, with a typical age of just 28, and is much more likely to be a hub for renters, with 76% of homes rented compared to 61.7% in Pyrmont. Life in Chippendale is also more likely to be car-free, as 59.8% of homes have no motor vehicle, which is far higher than the 28.8% in Pyrmont.
The gap in population growth is widening, with Chippendale growing by 19.1% since 2021 compared to 9% in Pyrmont. Both areas are highly educated and share an identical overall advantage score, sitting well above the national figure. They are also both very diverse, though this is far higher in Chippendale, where 61.8% of people were born overseas and 52.4% use another language at home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chippendale: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Pyrmont: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Chippendale: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 80–84 in Pyrmont: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Chippendale: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 75–79 in Pyrmont: 1.3% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Chippendale: 0.7% males, 0.4% females; 70–74 in Pyrmont: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Chippendale: 0.9% males, 0.5% females; 65–69 in Pyrmont: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Chippendale: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 60–64 in Pyrmont: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Chippendale: 1.5% males, 0.8% females; 55–59 in Pyrmont: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Chippendale: 1.6% males, 1.2% females; 50–54 in Pyrmont: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Chippendale: 1.8% males, 1.4% females; 45–49 in Pyrmont: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Chippendale: 3.2% males, 2.2% females; 40–44 in Pyrmont: 4.3% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Chippendale: 4.8% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Pyrmont: 6.5% males, 6.1% females
- 30–34 in Chippendale: 8.4% males, 7.8% females; 30–34 in Pyrmont: 7.0% males, 6.8% females
- 25–29 in Chippendale: 11.4% males, 11.9% females; 25–29 in Pyrmont: 5.8% males, 5.7% females
- 20–24 in Chippendale: 11.5% males, 14.1% females; 20–24 in Pyrmont: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Chippendale: 1.4% males, 1.9% females; 15–19 in Pyrmont: 1.2% males, 1.1% females
- 10–14 in Chippendale: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 10–14 in Pyrmont: 1.3% males, 1.2% females
- 5–9 in Chippendale: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 5–9 in Pyrmont: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 0–4 in Chippendale: 1.0% males, 0.9% females; 0–4 in Pyrmont: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Chippendale with nearby areas
Compare Pyrmont with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chippendale vs Pyrmont [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/117031639/chippendale/vs/117031641/pyrmont