Compare
Glebe - Forest Lodge vs Sydney (South) - Haymarket
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Glebe - Forest Lodge profile · Sydney (South) - Haymarket profile
Glebe - Forest Lodge Sydney (South) - Haymarket
Glebe - Forest Lodge and Sydney (South) - Haymarket are neighbouring inner-city areas with very different social profiles. Sydney (South) - Haymarket is far more diverse, with 76.9% of people born overseas and 69.5% using another language at home. In contrast, Glebe - Forest Lodge is more likely to be without religion (56.0%) and has a higher share of high earners, with 26.2% making $2,000 or more a week. Glebe - Forest Lodge also has more families and children, with more schools per 1,000 children and 9.9% of its population under 15, compared to just 4.9% in Sydney (South) - Haymarket.
Everyday life in both areas is similar in terms of wealth and convenience, with nearly identical typical weekly household incomes of around $2,100 and just a 5-minute drive to the city. However, they differ in how people get around; Sydney (South) - Haymarket has far fewer cars and more people using trains. This is consistent with a more transient population, as 71.7% of residents there moved in the last five years, compared to 56.8% in Glebe - Forest Lodge.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,576
- First area, 2016: 19,609
- First area, 2021: 20,262
- Second area, 2021: 19,935
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 0.3% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 0.1% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 70–74 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 0.7% males, 0.6% females
- 65–69 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 1.9% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 1.0% males, 0.8% females
- 60–64 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 55–59 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 1.6% males, 1.2% females
- 50–54 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 45–49 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 40–44 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 3.9% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 5.0% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 6.5% males, 6.1% females
- 30–34 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 6.3% males, 5.9% females; 30–34 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 10.0% males, 9.9% females
- 25–29 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 5.9% males, 6.7% females; 25–29 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 10.6% males, 11.8% females
- 20–24 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 4.2% males, 5.2% females; 20–24 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 6.7% males, 7.3% females
- 15–19 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 1.1% males, 1.2% females
- 10–14 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 1.5% males, 1.2% females; 10–14 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 5–9 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 5–9 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 0–4 in Glebe - Forest Lodge: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Sydney (South) - Haymarket: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $859
- First area, 2016: $950
- First area, 2021: $1,230
- Second area, 2021: $819
- First area, 2011: $1,523
- First area, 2016: $1,814
- First area, 2021: $2,080
- Second area, 2021: $2,108
- First area, 2011: $2,371
- First area, 2016: $2,572
- First area, 2021: $3,202
- Second area, 2021: $2,058
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.0
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $508
- First area, 2021: $505
- Second area, 2021: $620
- First area, 2011: $2,750
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $2,949
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.40
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Glebe - Forest Lodge with nearby areas
Compare Sydney (South) - Haymarket with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Glebe - Forest Lodge vs Sydney (South) - Haymarket [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/117031331/glebe-forest-lodge/vs/117031645/sydney-haymarket