Compare
Rutherford (South) - Telarah vs Beresfield - Hexham
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Rutherford (South) - Telarah profile · Beresfield - Hexham profile
Rutherford (South) - Telarah Beresfield - Hexham
Rutherford (South) - Telarah and Beresfield - Hexham are nearby areas in New South Wales with very different growth patterns. Rutherford (South) - Telarah is a much younger area, with a typical resident aged 34 and a population that has grown by 16.4% since 2021. In contrast, Beresfield - Hexham is older, with a typical resident aged 39 and a more stable population that grew by only 1.4%. The two areas also differ in their housing and services; Beresfield - Hexham has a much higher share of outright home ownership at 35.0% and provides far more schools per 1,000 children.
These two places have tracked differently since 2011, as Rutherford (South) - Telarah has seen a surge in new residents, with 43.5% moving in over the last five years. Despite this shift, they share many similarities, including very similar proportions of First Nations people and people who identify as having no religion. Both areas also feature a high number of detached houses, with 88.8% in Rutherford (South) - Telarah and 93.2% in Beresfield - Hexham.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2021: 7,976
- Second area, 2011: 8,362
- Second area, 2016: 8,360
- Second area, 2021: 8,561
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Beresfield - Hexham: 0.7% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Beresfield - Hexham: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Beresfield - Hexham: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 1.7% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 3.2% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 25–29 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 3.1% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Beresfield - Hexham: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Rutherford (South) - Telarah: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Beresfield - Hexham: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2021: $724
- Second area, 2011: $436
- Second area, 2016: $514
- Second area, 2021: $633
- First area, 2021: $1,470
- Second area, 2011: $930
- Second area, 2016: $1,042
- Second area, 2021: $1,237
- First area, 2021: $1,786
- Second area, 2011: $1,110
- Second area, 2016: $1,240
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $220
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $340
- First area, 2021: $1,647
- Second area, 2011: $1,408
- Second area, 2016: $1,370
- Second area, 2021: $1,450
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Rutherford (South) - Telarah with nearby areas
Compare Beresfield - Hexham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rutherford (South) - Telarah vs Beresfield - Hexham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/106021616/rutherford-telarah/vs/111031223/beresfield-hexham