Compare
Carnamah vs Chapman Valley
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 165 km apart · Carnamah profile · Chapman Valley profile
Carnamah Chapman Valley
Chapman Valley and Carnamah are both rural Western Australian areas, but they differ sharply in wealth and layout. Chapman Valley is wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $2,046 compared to $1,234 in Carnamah. This gap has widened since 2011, as has the difference in typical monthly home-loan payments, which are far higher in Chapman Valley at $2,000. Carnamah is more centrally planned; it has a walkability score of 3.4 (mostly car-dependent) and 61.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a local amenity. In contrast, Chapman Valley is car-dependent, with a score of 0.3 and no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries.
Everyday life shares many similarities in both places, such as a high preference for detached houses and roughly the same share of people born overseas. Both areas have two schools and similar numbers of people who have served in the Defence Force. While they share these traits, the gap in household wealth has grown over time, and the difference in family structure has increased, with children under 15 now well higher in Chapman Valley than in Carnamah.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 546
- First area, 2016: 548
- First area, 2021: 552
- Second area, 2011: 1,174
- Second area, 2016: 1,422
- Second area, 2021: 1,556
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Carnamah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Chapman Valley: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Carnamah: 0.7% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Chapman Valley: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Carnamah: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Chapman Valley: 1.9% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Carnamah: 4.4% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Chapman Valley: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Carnamah: 5.5% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Chapman Valley: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Carnamah: 5.9% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Chapman Valley: 3.8% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Carnamah: 1.7% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Chapman Valley: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Carnamah: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Chapman Valley: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Carnamah: 3.7% males, 2.0% females; 45–49 in Chapman Valley: 4.8% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Carnamah: 4.6% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Chapman Valley: 2.5% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Carnamah: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Chapman Valley: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Carnamah: 1.8% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Chapman Valley: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Carnamah: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Chapman Valley: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Carnamah: 1.3% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Chapman Valley: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Carnamah: 2.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Chapman Valley: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Carnamah: 1.1% males, 2.0% females; 10–14 in Chapman Valley: 4.6% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Carnamah: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Chapman Valley: 4.4% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Carnamah: 3.9% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Chapman Valley: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $549
- First area, 2016: $698
- First area, 2021: $731
- Second area, 2011: $568
- Second area, 2016: $732
- Second area, 2021: $932
- First area, 2011: $1,007
- First area, 2016: $1,136
- First area, 2021: $1,234
- Second area, 2011: $1,244
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $2,046
- First area, 2011: $1,231
- First area, 2016: $1,489
- First area, 2021: $1,766
- Second area, 2011: $1,413
- Second area, 2016: $1,932
- Second area, 2021: $2,286
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $95
- First area, 2016: $100
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $650
- First area, 2016: $737
- First area, 2021: $867
- Second area, 2011: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Carnamah with nearby areas
Compare Chapman Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Carnamah vs Chapman Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA51470/carnamah/vs/LGA51610/chapman-valley