Compare
Port Augusta vs Roxby Downs
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 240 km apart · Port Augusta profile · Roxby Downs profile
Port Augusta Roxby Downs
Port Augusta and Roxby Downs are two different South Australian hubs with starkly contrasting economic and social profiles. Roxby Downs is a high-earning center where the typical household income is $3,140 per week, compared to $1,275 in Port Augusta. It also has a much higher share of people who finished Year 12 (48.2% versus 32.2%) and a vastly different industry base, with half its workforce in mining. In contrast, Port Augusta has a much larger First Nations population (20.4% against 5.0%) and a higher proportion of residents aged 65 and over (17.7% compared to 1.6%).
The income gap between these two areas has widened since 2011, with the difference in typical household earnings growing to $1,865. Despite this, they are very similar in other ways, such as the share of volunteers (around 14%) and the proportion of homes with three or more bedrooms (about 80%). While Port Augusta has a high level of public transport access, Roxby Downs is effectively car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,985
- First area, 2016: 13,808
- First area, 2021: 13,829
- Second area, 2011: 4,702
- Second area, 2016: 3,884
- Second area, 2021: 3,976
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Augusta: 0.7% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Roxby Downs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Port Augusta: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Roxby Downs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Port Augusta: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Roxby Downs: 0.2% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Port Augusta: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Roxby Downs: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 65–69 in Port Augusta: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Roxby Downs: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 60–64 in Port Augusta: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Roxby Downs: 2.0% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Port Augusta: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Roxby Downs: 3.1% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in Port Augusta: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Roxby Downs: 3.8% males, 2.3% females
- 45–49 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Roxby Downs: 4.0% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Port Augusta: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Roxby Downs: 4.5% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Port Augusta: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Roxby Downs: 6.4% males, 4.7% females
- 30–34 in Port Augusta: 4.3% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Roxby Downs: 6.1% males, 5.2% females
- 25–29 in Port Augusta: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Roxby Downs: 5.3% males, 5.0% females
- 20–24 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Roxby Downs: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Roxby Downs: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Port Augusta: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Roxby Downs: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Roxby Downs: 4.5% males, 5.1% females
- 0–4 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Roxby Downs: 4.3% males, 4.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $541
- First area, 2016: $604
- First area, 2021: $699
- Second area, 2011: $1,464
- Second area, 2016: $1,547
- Second area, 2021: $1,787
- First area, 2011: $986
- First area, 2016: $1,103
- First area, 2021: $1,275
- Second area, 2011: $2,756
- Second area, 2016: $2,477
- Second area, 2021: $3,140
- First area, 2011: $1,245
- First area, 2016: $1,370
- First area, 2021: $1,653
- Second area, 2011: $2,840
- Second area, 2016: $2,760
- Second area, 2021: $3,467
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $150
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $196
- Second area, 2016: $198
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,213
- First area, 2021: $1,153
- Second area, 2011: $2,323
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Port Augusta with nearby areas
Compare Roxby Downs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Augusta vs Roxby Downs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA46090/port-augusta/vs/LGA46970/roxby-downs