Compare
Charles Sturt vs Salisbury
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Charles Sturt profile · Salisbury profile
Charles Sturt Salisbury
Salisbury and Charles Sturt are two nearby areas in South Australia with distinct profiles. Charles Sturt is more affluent, with a typical weekly family income of $2,072 compared to $1,586 in Salisbury. Education levels are also far higher in Charles Sturt, where 26.1% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 15.0% in Salisbury. In contrast, Salisbury has a higher share of family homes, with separate houses making up 83.5% of dwellings, well above the 65.5% seen in Charles Sturt.
Income and education gaps between the two areas have widened since 2011. Despite this, they share many common traits, including very similar rates of people with long-term health conditions (about 29%) and a nearly identical proportion of people with no religion. Both areas also have similar shares of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents, though Salisbury's population is slightly larger.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 104,981
- First area, 2016: 111,759
- First area, 2021: 121,840
- Second area, 2011: 129,109
- Second area, 2016: 137,979
- Second area, 2021: 145,806
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Charles Sturt: 1.2% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Salisbury: 0.7% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Charles Sturt: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Salisbury: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Charles Sturt: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Salisbury: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Charles Sturt: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Salisbury: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Charles Sturt: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Salisbury: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Charles Sturt: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Salisbury: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Charles Sturt: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Salisbury: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Charles Sturt: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Salisbury: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Charles Sturt: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Salisbury: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Charles Sturt: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Salisbury: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Charles Sturt: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Salisbury: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Charles Sturt: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Salisbury: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Charles Sturt: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Salisbury: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Charles Sturt: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Salisbury: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Charles Sturt: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Salisbury: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Charles Sturt: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 10–14 in Salisbury: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Charles Sturt: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Salisbury: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Charles Sturt: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Salisbury: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $524
- First area, 2016: $614
- First area, 2021: $786
- Second area, 2011: $502
- Second area, 2016: $530
- Second area, 2021: $643
- First area, 2011: $1,019
- First area, 2016: $1,231
- First area, 2021: $1,563
- Second area, 2011: $1,021
- Second area, 2016: $1,141
- Second area, 2021: $1,356
- First area, 2011: $1,345
- First area, 2016: $1,607
- First area, 2021: $2,072
- Second area, 2011: $1,193
- Second area, 2016: $1,320
- Second area, 2021: $1,586
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $288
- First area, 2021: $325
- Second area, 2011: $240
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,700
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,410
- Second area, 2016: $1,357
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Charles Sturt with nearby areas
Compare Salisbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Charles Sturt vs Salisbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA41060/charles-sturt/vs/LGA47140/salisbury