Compare
Burdekin vs Mackay
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 219 km apart · Burdekin profile · Mackay profile
Burdekin Mackay
Mackay and Burdekin are two Queensland regions with distinct social and economic profiles. Mackay is younger and more urban, with 20.1% of its people under 15 and a typical resident aged 38. It has much better access to public transport, with 59% of homes within a 10-minute walk of a stop, while Burdekin has none. Burdekin has a much older population, where the typical resident is 45, and a far higher share of homes are owned outright at 42.8%. Burdekin also sees a much higher proportion of recent overseas arrivals at 25.8%, compared to 12.8% in Mackay.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, including nearly identical shares of First Nations people and very similar unemployment rates. They also both sit near the national figure for overall advantage. However, some gaps are widening; the difference in the typical age of residents has grown to seven years since 2011. Similarly, the gap in the number of people claiming no religion has increased, with Mackay now 14 percentage points higher than Burdekin.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 17,364
- First area, 2016: 17,074
- First area, 2021: 16,692
- Second area, 2011: 112,798
- Second area, 2016: 114,969
- Second area, 2021: 121,691
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Burdekin: 1.0% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Mackay: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Burdekin: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Mackay: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Burdekin: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Mackay: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Burdekin: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Mackay: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Burdekin: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Mackay: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Burdekin: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Mackay: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Burdekin: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Mackay: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Burdekin: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Mackay: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Burdekin: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Mackay: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Burdekin: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Mackay: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Burdekin: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Mackay: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Burdekin: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Mackay: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Burdekin: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Mackay: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Burdekin: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Mackay: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Burdekin: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Mackay: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Burdekin: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Mackay: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Burdekin: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Mackay: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Burdekin: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Mackay: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $540
- First area, 2016: $617
- First area, 2021: $723
- Second area, 2011: $705
- Second area, 2016: $698
- Second area, 2021: $866
- First area, 2011: $1,009
- First area, 2016: $1,177
- First area, 2021: $1,345
- Second area, 2011: $1,578
- Second area, 2016: $1,456
- Second area, 2021: $1,853
- First area, 2011: $1,284
- First area, 2016: $1,489
- First area, 2021: $1,804
- Second area, 2011: $1,821
- Second area, 2016: $1,774
- Second area, 2021: $2,215
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $180
- First area, 2016: $210
- First area, 2021: $222
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $277
- Second area, 2021: $340
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,220
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Burdekin with nearby areas
Compare Mackay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Burdekin vs Mackay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA31900/burdekin/vs/LGA34770/mackay