Compare
Central Goldfields vs Pyrenees
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 43 km apart · Central Goldfields profile · Pyrenees profile
Central Goldfields Pyrenees
Central Goldfields and Pyrenees are nearby Victorian areas with very different levels of accessibility and advantage. Central Goldfields has much better infrastructure for walking, with 63.5% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to 27.8% in Pyrenees. It also has far more public transport stops and departures, and larger average school sizes of 256 students compared to just 58 in Pyrenees. In contrast, Pyrenees has far higher scores for overall advantage, education and job skills, and access to money and resources. Central Goldfields also sees a far higher rate of assault and property damage, while Pyrenees has a far higher burglary rate.
These two areas have seen the gap in their crime rates widen over the last five years, with the rate in Central Goldfields rising much faster. However, they share many other characteristics; for instance, both have an identical share of children under 15 at 14.6%. They also have similar proportions of people born overseas and nearly the same number of people per home. Both areas have a population that is older than the national figure, with Central Goldfields at 31.1% and Pyrenees at 27.3% aged 65 and over.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 12,496
- First area, 2016: 12,995
- First area, 2021: 13,483
- Second area, 2011: 6,669
- Second area, 2016: 7,238
- Second area, 2021: 7,671
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Central Goldfields: 1.5% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Pyrenees: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Central Goldfields: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Pyrenees: 1.4% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Central Goldfields: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 75–79 in Pyrenees: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Central Goldfields: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 70–74 in Pyrenees: 4.5% males, 3.5% females
- 65–69 in Central Goldfields: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Pyrenees: 4.7% males, 4.2% females
- 60–64 in Central Goldfields: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Pyrenees: 4.6% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Central Goldfields: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Pyrenees: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Central Goldfields: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Pyrenees: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Central Goldfields: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Pyrenees: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Central Goldfields: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 40–44 in Pyrenees: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Central Goldfields: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 35–39 in Pyrenees: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in Central Goldfields: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Pyrenees: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Central Goldfields: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Pyrenees: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Central Goldfields: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Pyrenees: 2.1% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Central Goldfields: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Pyrenees: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Central Goldfields: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Pyrenees: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Central Goldfields: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Pyrenees: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Central Goldfields: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Pyrenees: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $381
- First area, 2016: $452
- First area, 2021: $503
- Second area, 2011: $389
- Second area, 2016: $472
- Second area, 2021: $579
- First area, 2011: $685
- First area, 2016: $775
- First area, 2021: $904
- Second area, 2011: $732
- Second area, 2016: $876
- Second area, 2021: $1,101
- First area, 2011: $864
- First area, 2016: $1,001
- First area, 2021: $1,260
- Second area, 2011: $910
- Second area, 2016: $1,148
- Second area, 2021: $1,419
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $150
- First area, 2016: $195
- First area, 2021: $235
- Second area, 2011: $130
- Second area, 2016: $160
- Second area, 2021: $210
- First area, 2011: $867
- First area, 2016: $975
- First area, 2021: $1,018
- Second area, 2011: $997
- Second area, 2016: $1,066
- Second area, 2021: $1,083
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Central Goldfields with nearby areas
Compare Pyrenees with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Central Goldfields vs Pyrenees [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA21670/central-goldfields/vs/LGA25990/pyrenees