Compare
South Hedland vs Apatula
Indigenous Region comparison ≈ 1,007 km apart · South Hedland profile · Apatula profile
South Hedland Apatula
South Hedland and Apatula are both remote regions with large First Nations populations, but they differ sharply in economic and social outcomes. First Nations residents in South Hedland have a typical household income of $2,034, which is far higher than the $955 in Apatula. This economic gap is mirrored in education and employment; Year 12 completion is far higher in South Hedland at 32.8%, while the unemployment rate is far higher in Apatula at 23.7%.
These two areas have tracked differently since 2011, with South Hedland developing more urban infrastructure. For example, 46.1% of South Hedland homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to 0.0% in Apatula. However, they share a similar number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. While both are mostly car-dependent, Apatula has a much stronger linguistic connection to the land, with 80.7% of people speaking a First Nations language compared to 29.3% in South Hedland.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare South Hedland with nearby areas
Compare Apatula with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). South Hedland vs Apatula [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ireg/IREG506/south-hedland/vs/IREG709/apatula