Compare
Brisbane vs Norfolk Island
Indigenous Region comparison ≈ 1,513 km apart · Brisbane profile · Norfolk Island profile
Brisbane Norfolk Island
Brisbane and Norfolk Island are far apart and differ greatly in their layout and demographics. Brisbane is much more walkable, with a score of 5.9 (somewhat walkable), while Norfolk Island is 2.6 (mostly car-dependent). Access to services is far higher in Brisbane, where 79.9% of homes are within a 10 minute walk of public transport, compared to 0.0% in Norfolk Island. There are also stark differences among First Nations people; the typical person is far older in Norfolk Island (51 years) than in Brisbane (23 years), and First Nations languages are far more common in Norfolk Island, spoken by 52.2% of people.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to First Nations median personal income, which sits at $635 in Brisbane and $649 in Norfolk Island. While they share this similar income level, other aspects of life vary, such as the terrain, which is well steeper in Norfolk Island. Brisbane also has a far larger First Nations population, with 100,929 people compared to 23 in Norfolk Island.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Brisbane with nearby areas
Compare Norfolk Island with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Brisbane vs Norfolk Island [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ireg/IREG301/brisbane/vs/IREG903/norfolk-island