Compare
Papunya vs Areyonga
Indigenous Location comparison ≈ 104 km apart · Papunya profile · Areyonga profile
Papunya Areyonga
Papunya and Areyonga are two remote Northern Territory locations with distinct layouts. Papunya is the larger of the two, with 389 First Nations people compared to 211 in Areyonga. The two areas differ sharply in their local services; while every home in Papunya is within a 15-minute walk of health services, no home in Areyonga is. In contrast, all homes in Areyonga are within a 15-minute walk of a park, while none in Papunya are. Papunya also has more street intersections per square kilometre and a wider variety of nearby amenities.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining car-dependent with walkability scores of 1.7. They share many common traits, including very high rates of First Nations language speakers (over 96% in both) and almost identical typical personal incomes for First Nations people. In both places, no homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries or public transport. While Areyonga has a noticeably older First Nations population and a higher rate of Year 12 completion, it also has a well higher First Nations unemployment rate than Papunya.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Papunya with nearby areas
Compare Areyonga with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Papunya vs Areyonga [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iloc/ILOC70901101/papunya/vs/ILOC70901401/areyonga