Compare
Charles vs Engawala
Indigenous Location comparison ≈ 113 km apart · Charles profile · Engawala profile
Charles Engawala
Charles and Engawala are two different types of remote settings in the Northern Territory. Charles is more developed, where the walkability score is somewhat walkable and 97.6% of homes are near public transport. In contrast, Engawala is car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries or health services. There are also sharp differences in education and income for First Nations people; typical personal income is $452 in Charles, far higher than the $251 seen in Engawala, while Year 12 completion is far higher in Charles at 27.0% compared to 12.5% in Engawala.
Both areas share a similar flat landscape, with almost identical mean terrain slopes of around 3%. The gap in First Nations unemployment is particularly stark and has widened, with Charles at 18.0% while Engawala sits at 0.0%. While Charles has more amenities and a larger First Nations population, Engawala is far more linguistically traditional, with 98.6% of people speaking a First Nations language.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Charles with nearby areas
Compare Engawala with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Charles vs Engawala [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iloc/ILOC70800101/charles/vs/ILOC70900503/engawala