Compare
Derwent Valley vs Cygnet
Indigenous Location comparison ≈ 62 km apart · Derwent Valley profile · Cygnet profile
Derwent Valley Cygnet
Derwent Valley and Cygnet are two different types of Tasmanian landscapes. Cygnet is very walkable, with 92% of homes in a 15-minute-city walkshed and a walkability score of 6.6 (very walkable). In contrast, Derwent Valley is mostly car-dependent, with only 39.1% of homes in a similar walkshed and a walkability score of 3.9. This gap is clear across the board, with Cygnet having far more homes within a short walk of health services (92.1% compared to 25.3%) and schools (85.7% compared to 47%).
Both areas share a similar typical personal income for First Nations residents, sitting around $500. Beyond this, the two places differ significantly in their First Nations populations. Derwent Valley has a far larger number of First Nations people (756 compared to 200) and a well higher unemployment rate among this group (12.6% compared to 5.7%). At the same time, Year 12 completion is well higher in Derwent Valley at 30.1%, while the typical First Nations resident in Cygnet is noticeably older at 32.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Derwent Valley with nearby areas
Compare Cygnet with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Derwent Valley vs Cygnet [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iloc/ILOC60100203/derwent-valley/vs/ILOC60100401/cygnet