Compare
Murrin Bridge vs Griffith
Indigenous Location comparison ≈ 126 km apart · Murrin Bridge profile · Griffith profile
Murrin Bridge Griffith
Murrin Bridge and Griffith are both regional areas in New South Wales, but they differ sharply in size and accessibility. Griffith is more walkable, with 43.7% of homes near a 15-minute-city walkshed and a score of 4.1 (somewhat walkable), while Murrin Bridge is car-dependent with a score of 0.5. There are also significant gaps for First Nations people; in Griffith, the typical personal income is $605, which is far higher than the $364 seen in Murrin Bridge. First Nations residents are also far older in Murrin Bridge, where the typical age is 40, compared to just 23 in Griffith.
These differences in accessibility and demographics have remained distinct over time. While the two areas share a similar flat landscape with low terrain slopes, the gap in basic amenities is wide. Griffith has far more homes within walking distance of schools (52.1%) and health services (35.6%), whereas Murrin Bridge has no homes within a 15-minute walk of these services. However, Murrin Bridge has a higher share of homes within reach of a park, at 100%.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Murrin Bridge with nearby areas
Compare Griffith with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Murrin Bridge vs Griffith [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iloc/ILOC10300302/murrin-bridge/vs/ILOC10501201/griffith