Compare
Borroloola vs Barkly
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 366 km apart · Borroloola profile · Barkly profile
Borroloola Barkly
Borroloola and Barkly are both remote areas in the Northern Territory, but they differ significantly in layout and language. Borroloola is more walkable, with 53.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 41.8% near health services. In contrast, Barkly is far less accessible, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. Culturally, Barkly has a much higher share of people who speak a First Nations language at 68.2%, compared to 17.9% in Borroloola. First Nations unemployment is also far higher in Barkly at 36.5%, while Borroloola's rate is 12.1%.
Everyday life in both places shares some common traits, such as a typical First Nations age of 25 and very similar personal incomes for First Nations people. Both areas are entirely car-dependent and lack any homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. While Borroloola has more Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and a little higher First Nations household income, Barkly has a slightly higher rate of Year 12 completion among First Nations residents.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Borroloola with nearby areas
Compare Barkly with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Borroloola vs Barkly [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE705001/borroloola/vs/IARE707003/barkly