Compare
Fremantle vs Stirling
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 19 km apart · Fremantle profile · Stirling profile
Fremantle Stirling
Fremantle and Stirling are both highly accessible areas, though Fremantle is far more walkable. It is described as a walker's paradise with a score of 8.2, while Stirling is very walkable with a score of 6.6. In Fremantle, 96.1% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of health services, which is far higher than the 54.2% in Stirling. Fremantle also has a much denser street network with 406 intersections per square kilometre, compared to 176 in Stirling.
Everyday life in both places shares a high level of convenience, with nearly every home in both areas located within a 10-minute walk of public transport and a 15-minute walk of a park. They also share very similar profiles for First Nations residents, with both having a typical age of 27 and nearly identical household incomes. While Stirling has a far larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 2,699 people, the gap in First Nations median personal income is small, with Stirling being a little higher at $638 compared to $518 in Fremantle.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Fremantle with nearby areas
Compare Stirling with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fremantle vs Stirling [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE505007/fremantle/vs/IARE505018/stirling