Compare
Cockburn vs Kwinana
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Cockburn profile · Kwinana profile
Cockburn Kwinana
Cockburn and Kwinana are two nearby areas in Western Australia with very different levels of accessibility. Cockburn is more convenient for residents on foot, with a walkability score of 5.4 (somewhat walkable) compared to 3.9 (mostly car-dependent) in Kwinana. This is seen in the distance to essential services; 63.1% of Cockburn homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 35.1% of homes in Kwinana share that access. Education outcomes also differ for First Nations residents, with Year 12 completion far higher in Cockburn at 43.1% compared to 27.0% in Kwinana.
Both areas share a very similar landscape, with nearly identical average terrain slopes. They also both provide good access to transit, though Cockburn has a higher share of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport at 87.1% compared to 78.8% in Kwinana. Other gaps also exist for First Nations people; unemployment is well higher in Kwinana at 17.2%, and the typical First Nations resident in Kwinana is noticeably older at 25 than in Cockburn, where the typical age is 22.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Cockburn with nearby areas
Compare Kwinana with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cockburn vs Kwinana [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE505006/cockburn/vs/IARE505011/kwinana