Compare
Murray Bridge vs Tea Tree Gully
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 59 km apart · Murray Bridge profile · Tea Tree Gully profile
Murray Bridge Tea Tree Gully
Murray Bridge and Tea Tree Gully differ most in how people get around and access services. Tea Tree Gully is very walkable, with 80.3% of homes in a 15-minute-city walkshed and a typical person having 6.1 amenity types nearby. In contrast, Murray Bridge is mostly car-dependent, with only 39.9% of homes in a walkshed and 3.7 amenity types nearby. There is also a notable gap in First Nations outcomes; in Tea Tree Gully, 45.1% of First Nations people finished Year 12, compared to 31.5% in Murray Bridge. Typical First Nations household income is also well higher in Tea Tree Gully at $1,738, while it is $1,155 in Murray Bridge.
Both areas have a similar number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and a similar First Nations unemployment rate. This shared experience extends to language, as the share of people speaking a First Nations language in both areas is higher than most other places, sitting near the national figure. While Tea Tree Gully has much higher rates of people living within a short walk of schools and health services, the two areas remain comparable in their overall First Nations population size.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Murray Bridge with nearby areas
Compare Tea Tree Gully with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Murray Bridge vs Tea Tree Gully [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE401012/murray-bridge/vs/IARE401020/tea-tree-gully