Compare
Barossa vs Port Augusta
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 237 km apart · Barossa profile · Port Augusta profile
Barossa Port Augusta
Barossa and Port Augusta are two distinct South Australian regions with very different living patterns. Port Augusta is far more walkable, with a score of 4.9 (somewhat walkable) compared to Barossa's 2.7 (mostly car-dependent). This is seen in daily access, as 86.4% of Port Augusta homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, while only 36.4% of Barossa homes have the same access. There are also stark contrasts for First Nations residents; the typical household income is $1,805 in Barossa, which is far higher than the $1,121 found in Port Augusta.
Both areas share a similar natural landscape, with almost identical average terrain slopes. While their geography is alike, their social trends have tracked differently since 2011. Barossa has a higher rate of First Nations Year 12 completion at 39.1%, compared to 20.9% in Port Augusta. This educational gap is consistent with other figures, as First Nations unemployment is well higher in Port Augusta at 18.2%, while it is much lower in Barossa at 10.0%.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Barossa with nearby areas
Compare Port Augusta with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Barossa vs Port Augusta [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE401003/barossa/vs/IARE402005/port-augusta